Monday, November 14, 2016

Nov. 10, 2016: Ca. 1450: Civic Processions

Here I submit my translation of a new note, as of Nov. 10, 2016, by Franco in his "Ca. 1450: Triumphs and ..." series. The original is at http://www.naibi.net/A/522-TRIONFICORTEI-Z.pdf. This translation first appeared in the Tarot History Forum at http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1092&start=30#p17993. After the translation some observations by me follow, which also first appeared on THF following the translation. For further discussion see the THF link.

Ca 1450: Florence - Triumphs and civic processions

1. Introduction


This study is a further step in defining the beginning of the spread in Florence, in the first half of the fifteenth century, of triumphal motifs as new fashions in the demonstrations and decorations of various products of the minor arts. Previously I have written notes on birth trays, wedding chests, and the Triumphi of Petrarch (1). At the origin of these studies I proposed as my main aim finding in objects of the types mentioned possible points for giving origin in Florence also to the fashion for naibi a trionfi, or playing cards with the addition to the common deck of a series not well defined of special cards, which gave rise to the tarot. (2) The initial intention was was scarcely comforted by the results, which showed that the fashion for those objects usually occurred after the new playing cards came into use.

It remains for me to consider other products, as well as special events, which could potentially affect the birth of those special cards. The spirit of this ongoing research has understandably changed and is getting closer to the formation of a prejudice, that the triumphal motifs entered playing cards before the other fashions, and then in an independent manner so as not to justify a deepening of this research; it would not be possible to interpret the origin of a given phenomenon as caused by what happened in related fields ... later.

While I have described in the past new fifteenth century documents useful for the history of playing cards (3), in these cases, the study does not extend to the search for original documents that could shed new light on the issues, but at its basis is placed an analysis of work published on the events in question. In examining the copious literature,
____________
1. http://www.naibi.net/ 5/11, 5/17, 5/21.
2. http://www.naibi.net/A/518-TRIONF1450-Z.pdf
3. F. Pratesi, Giochi di carte nella repubblica fiorentina. Ariccia 2016.

2
I will use, even more than usual, selections with drastic cuts, bearing in mind the importance of the various contributions in view of the specific underlying goal of this research, very peculiar and limited.

I have not utilized the numerous and repetitive discussions on these issues that have accumulated recently on the Internet, because they usually do not provide new elements. I can, however, acknowledge that many of the topics that will be introduced below have been widely discussed in some web pages: I can mention one name for all, Huck in the Researcher's Study of a major forum on tarot cards (4). Using this address one can find countless notices, abundantly commented upon, much more numerous, detailed and repeated more times than I can write here.

2. Triumphal events.

In the study of artistic and literary triumphs/tarot advanced recurrently have been hints of their origin in the triumphal displays that took place in the main Italian towns during the late Middle Ages and early Renaissance; for a broad illustration of the theme one can refer to a book regarded as a pioneer in the field (5). Under the term “triumphant event” fall, however, very different events; a first distinction can be seen between individual events - such as the triumphal entry into the city of a personage to whom a solemn welcome is dedicated - and ritual processions repeated at regular intervals, always with special solemnity.

To begin the review it is therefore necessary to restrict the scope of triumphal events and to distinguish the various types. For a convenient subdivision we can refer to a study by Antonio Pinelli, Feste e trionfi [celebrations and triumphs], among the most cited in this regard (6).
But since real triumphs do not interest us as much in themselves as for the imaginary ones they suggest, it can be useful, to better analyze them, to outline a series of subdivisions based on contents
___________
4. viewforum.php?f=11.
5. G. Moakley, The tarot cards painted by Bonifazio Bembo. New York 1966.
6. S. Settis (ed.), Memoria dell’antico nell’arte italiana. Vol. 2, I generi e i temi ritrovati. Torino 1985, pp. 281-350.

3
and destination. Essentially the chronicles describe four different types of triumphal ceremonies:
1) theatrical performances and courtly pomp that dramatize the Triumphs of Petrarch, more or less faithfully and completely, often mixing them with other allegorical ideas;
2) the processions set up during Carnival or other festive occasions, where more or less conscious reminiscences probably remain of the old triumphal ritual, to which sometimes are added, in the humanistic age, allegorical floats and parades programmatically inspired by Roman models;
3) depictions of a real ancient triumph, more or less imaginatively reconstructed as part of city or court festivals;
4) triumphs paying tribute to a victorious general, or at least to an eminent person, who makes his "grand entrance" in the city.
As we see, the typologies sought are already listed separately in the four types of theater shows, carnival parades and the like, triumphs reproduced from ancient times, and triumphs bestowed on living personages. The same author warns that a mixed type of events must also be considered, in which, that is, in order to frame a given event, more than one of the four types identified is required.

One can easily understand that within the four groups mentioned further subdivisions can be introduced, so as to identify the specific type with higher precision. If we choose Florence as a reference, we can use the setting by Paola Ventrone, inspired mainly by the theater but extending its scope to aspects, somehow connected, that fall fully within our interests.
An acquisition central to the research is the finding that, in fifteenth-century Florence, four different types of 'religious performance’ coexisted, employing as many different performative languages to carry out their tasks: the celebration of the Baptist, by which the ruling class propagated the appearance of a republic in harmonious concord and ideally perfect; the procession of the Magi, which allowed the main members of the establishment to assert their preeminence in the streets, flaunting regal pomp otherwise politically unacceptable outside the time of the festival; the festivals of Oltrarno, who wanted to nourish the faith of believers creating an imagination of paradise through its visualization by means of scenic Brunelleschi machines; sacred depiction properly named, which was a real form of 'civic theater' aimed at the education of the Optimus civis and the construction of consensus. In particular, the latter two were also proposed as a complementary binary
4
system for the 'building' of citizens (in both the etymological and figurative sense): one, showing paradise as the ultimate prize of the deserving faithful; the other, showing them the way, the 'course of action' to follow to reach that goal. (7)
It is noteworthy that in the citation, various types of religious display are distinguished, rather than - as we are looking for here - those related to the triumphs; yet many aspects considered in the quotation end up returning to our field of investigation. In summary, they would be the celebrations of St. John, the procession of the Magi, the Oltrarno festivals, and sacred representations true and proper. Within the four cases it remains to verify how much and what their triumphant character was. In the last type, organized primarily for educational purposes of more lasting influence, the triumphal character can practically be considered non-existent.

As for the Oltrarno festivals, their triumphal character is, where appropriate, typically religious; somehow it is always faith that triumphs and the viewer witnesses ingenious depictions that deeply catch his attention, and his memory, with scenic surprises, accompanied by thunder and as a rule, sudden artificial flashes and unpredictable abrupt changes in scene. In principle, even some of the personages of the first or second level in these depictions may serve our purposes for reconstructing sequences of "figures" comparable with the playing cards added to the common deck; however, the confirmation of such hypotheses has not been found, and thus we neglect the Oltrarno festivals, along with the sacred depictions. In consequence we find ourselves fully involved with the celebrations of St. John and the Magi.

3. Public processions of triumphal carts.

The idea of a public procession is already stimulating for our purposes, always bearing in mind that the goal is to explain the sequence of triumphal cards added to the common deck of playing cards. The Triumphi of Petrarch were an important precedent, albeit on a reduced scale; for us, the main feature of the poem was that every triumph overcame the previous one. We cannot be surprised by the suggestion made,
_________________
7. P. Ventrone, Teatro e sacra rappresentazione a Firenze nel Rinascimento. Firenze 2016, p. XV.

5
among the first, by Werner Weisbach (8), that at the origin of the poem there were in fact public processions, in which the personages typically advance so that each takes the place of the previous one. For triumphal cards the basic idea is always that of a progression; so processions are welcomed that can make us glimpse a working mechanism that can, at least in principle, also be the source of that new type of playing cards; frequently recalled in this respect is the old book by Gertrude Moakley already mentioned.

We can discard as well (because of the need to support the analogy indicated) all depictions confined to a theater stage, however rudimentary, or stationary tableaux vivants, for which I can refer to the ample specific monograph of Philine Helas (9); However, the passage from this source on tableaux vivants in motion is not necessarily irregular and justly connected to the type that was sometimes in the processions. Clearly, they must be distinguished from a wagon that passes through the city with figures depicting, for example, a biblical episode; we need a whole series of floats that parade one after another.

The Triumphi can be recalled again because many depictions on cassoni and in illuminated manuscripts present precisely the triumphs of Petrarch, with carts pulled by various animals and accompanied by followers more or less consistent with the main subject. They are also images reproduced in the triumphal chariot processions that parade through the city. For our tarot, there would thus be an increase in their number, which already would be no mean feat.

Examination of the studies related to this subject soon brings us to the conclusion that all these famous triumphal parades of floats really happened; however, all the triumphal parades that are known from the Renaissance, with their triumphant personages standing on high carts, richly decorated - drawn by animals of various species and easily advancing through the movement of their wheels - do not serve our purpose, and we can neglect everything as greatly posterior to the introduction of the triumphs in playing cards. In short, we must go back in time, when the triumphal parades existed but had not yet taken the form of a parade of floats with wheels. What was
___________
8. W. Weisbach, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft, 26 (1903/04) 226-287.
9. Ph. Helas, Lebende Bilder in der italienischen Festkultur des 15. Jahrhunderts. Berlin 1999.

6
then in place of the triumphal carts? There were "buildings", wooden scaffoldings abundantly coated and decorated, transportable by a group of carriers; these are structures that we will meet later.

4. Triumphal entrances

A particular kind of triumphal procession at the city level, often referred to by the Latin term adventus, is the solemn entry of a king or a man who thus takes possession in a solemn manner of the city government. These marches will have testimonies from many cities, and not only Italian ones; indeed, going back in time, there are probably more traces in Burgundy, where they were habitual in the mid- fourteenth century, before making frequent appearances in Italy. (10)

We are interested particularly in Florence and here we encounter a rather curious situation. In particular, one might immediately jump to another topic and close the issue by stating that Florence had not been introduced to customs of this kind before 1440, for us given as the limit of the search. Receptions and festive jubilation for political or military successes involving the entire city were more or less frequent in Florence, but it does not appear that those displays of the people were organized and planned in advance using specialized workers coordinated by persons officially responsible for the enterprise (functions that the participants had for the celebrations of Saint John, and the Society of the Magi had for the related procession).

There remains, however, the fact of a very important that in a great triumphal event, which did not happen in Florence but in Naples, Florentines were coincidentally protagonists. In the famous procession that in 1443 accompanied Alfonso of Aragon into the city, after having driven out Anjou, it was the "Florentine nation" that organized the main part of the event. It is unlikely that the Florentines had acted only as bankers, financing the enterprise without taking care of the details. We have to think rather than the staging of the event itself corresponded to known superior technical ability of the Florentine work force and artists. It is enough to reflect on the complexity of Fortuna standing on a large golden sphere held
____________
10. P. Johanek, A. Lampen (ed.), Adventus. Köln etc. 2009

7
by an angel, or Caesar on a rotating terrestrial sphere, to understand that they needed technicians very experienced in machine building; Helas in the book cited even recalls the skills of Filippo Brunelleschi and Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli; although the circumstances have been widely studied and repeatedly discussed, details about those executing them are unknown.

The technical skills required ranged from the highest organized levels to the most minute operations the particular stagings; porters and extras could be found locally, but for the coordination and success of the whole the mobilization of Florentine experts was needed. Before us is then the following dilemma: to the Florentines that prepared and developed the details of the ceremony, will their generic skills such as decorators and expert builders of all types of machines be enough, or could they use directly their own specific experience in the field? The problematic fact is that for us there is not found in Florence, before 1443, an activity specific to that genre we call triumphally organized, unless leading back to the processions of the annual celebrations of the patron and the magi, which we will meet again later.

Nevertheless it appears significant that the subjects chosen by the Florentines for the triumphal procession in Naples in 1443 were the seven virtues (six mounted and Justice on a rich edifice), Fortune, and Caesar as emperor, personages who in one way or another are certainly part of the csequence preserved in the cards. Then it would be for us especially to be analyzed, and possibly verify whether similar figures could already be present in Florence three years earlier in those "naibi a trionfi" that were commissioned by Giusto Giusti.

5. Triumphs to victors

In parallel to the triumphal processions of the adventus type commented on so far, we have testimonies of the more traditional triumphs organized to celebrate a general who emerged victorious from a war or major battle. These episodes are clearly not programmable in advance and recall, perhaps more closely than all the other events, the triumphs that were solemnly celebrated in ancient Rome, again on the occasion of military victories.

8
In Florence there were several times popular events improvised for various occasions, including precisely also battles won. Other opportunities to celebrate in the streets of Florence were not lacking and were mainly related to the passage of famous people in the city: popes, emperors, kings, but also foreign embassies. The most sensational was probably the arrival in the city in 1439 of the various groups of prelates engaged in the Council of Ferrara, who moved to Florence to avoid an epidemic of plague. There was certainly no need for masked figures, if richly and exotically dressed patriarchs and Eastern theologians entered the city in procession, according to their custom; along with the religious personages came none other than the Byzantine emperor John VIII Palaeologus. For the almost impromptu character of these small town hospitality events it seems of little use to research here particular sequences of "figures" to put in relation with the triumphs-tarot.

Of true and proper triumphs officially organized as an honor given to a victorious leader or a visiting foreign monarch, I have not found any of significance in Florence for the time period; an example would be the procession that followed in 1419 Pope Martin V, who walked on a special timber walkway, built for the occasion, all the way from the provisional papacy of Santa Maria Novella to the cathedral, but it is not accompanied by allegorical figures. I can then look for other examples, which were actually celebrated: one can in fact find also in Florence rather similar events, instead of being quite odd, like those above, on the contrary were even seen recurring annually: the celebration of the Baptist and the procession of the Magi; these are the events that will be considered below.

6. Festivals of St. John

The festivities in honor of the patron saint, St. John the Baptist, were the most captivating and solemn at the city level, and besides the day of the anniversary, June 24, it also occupied several neighboring days; the duration of the celebration varied in the course of time to more than a week, but we can limit ourselves to the main events, which usually occupied on the day of the anniversary and the evenng before. A detailed reconstruction of the events traditionally repeated has been

9
compiled by Richard Trexler (11), but for some particulars the books books on the feast of St. John written by Gaetano Cambiagi (Fig. 1) (12), Cesare Guasti (13) and Luigi Gori (14) can also be useful (with the third one the most recent, such as to be dedicated to ... Benito Mussolini).

Image
Figure 1 – First publication on the festival of Saint John
_______________
9. R. C. Trexler, Public Life in Renaissance Florence. New York etc. 1980, pp. 240-278.
10. G. Cambiagi, Memorie istoriche riguardanti le feste solite farsi in Firenze per la natività di San Gio. Batista. Firenze 1766 (reprinted, Firenze 1985).
C. Guasti, Le feste di San Giovanni Batista in Firenze. Firenze 1884.
L. Gori, Le feste fiorentine attraverso i secoli. Le feste per San Giovanni. Firenze 1928

10
We can start with the evening before and outline the main events; in the morning the show began, that is, the external exposition in the shops of the most valuable manufactures and the most precious objects: the flower of flowers in all areas of Florentine production was presented to the eyes of passers-by, including rarities preserved jealously and that would not have been exhibited at any other time. In the eyes of a stranger who saw that exhibition for the first time, the display was certainly memorable and obtained a further propaganda effect in favor of the already renowned Florentine manufactures.

After this public display that validated material wealth followed, almost in the manner of purification, the procession of church people. Anyone who does not know the environment will be surprised by different aspects of that procession, starting with the number of participants: it required the participation of two members representing each of the numerous congregations of the regular clergy and also a large number of representatives of the secular clergy; a notice reported by Trexler for 1394 shows 380 members of religious orders and 132 from the secular clergy; those two such high numbers will probably change little for the years of our interest. Each participating group carried the most precious relics of his church or monastery and this was done suitably under cover of fine canopies that distinguished the entire procession.

In the evening, in contrast, paraded the banners of the city, with the offering brought to the Baptistery. Typically representatives of the armed companies of citizens had to participate, each under its own banner, arranged with the older members in front and the younger behind; the presence of two men per family was formally requested, with fines for those absent.

The most important events, at least from the civic point of view, took place on the day of the festival: in the morning, the procession of Saint John and in the afternoon the Palio. The Palio was a race by horses and jockeys from all sides, with the aim of winning the prestigious award. The race took place in lines, crossing the city from west to east. The Florentines were captivated by the show, much anticipated, but they did not have an active and direct participation of the kind that we still know today through the streets of Siena.

11
7. Procession of St. John

For our purposes, the most interesting part of the celebrations of the patron saint is clearly the solemn procession that followed the morning offerings. The St John's procession was nominally dedicated to the patron saint of the city, but what was honored in this case was especially the Florentine republic. All the "autonomous and subject communities" were required to participate with the candles or the Palio, which were first gathered in the Piazza dei Signori and then taken in procession. In a substantial proportion of cases, the participation with the offering of the candle was the only tribute that the ruling required of a given town (in other cases the charges could be much more burdensome). A number of these candles were not simple tapers, but understood as taller and more massive than average; here one went above [i.e. high on a vehicle, Franco tells me] and the candle, thus finely decorated, in some cases was raised high above the wooden scaffolding and painted paper; appropriate descriptions (and images that have to be considered as only indicative, as they correspond to [similar items of] much later times) are also found in the book by Gori already mentioned.
Those that Goro Dati called Towers [Torre] were deployed on the morning of June 24 in the Piazza of the Signori, other candles that were not so big and tall, some with real wax to burn, others of paper maché and wood, painted in many guises and so heavy that no one could carry them by hand, were placed on carts, having, for the most part, the form of turrets, and those of the Castles subject to the rule of the Republic, who were required to send them. (15)
There were also painters, usually lower level, who specialized precisely in the decoration of the candles (16); on the production of candles and of wax, in Florence of the epoch, for which one can usefully consult a brief study by Paola Giorgi (17).

Along with the candles of the festival of St. John existed the palios [palii, embroidered tapestries], with figures and extraordinary decorations, presented among the offerings and then taken in procession and left to the town, which preserved them, along with the candles, in the Baptistery. These palios were hangings of fine and richly decorated fabrics; to understand what they were we can exploit the survival of the
________________
15. L. Gori, Le feste etc., p. 72.
16. W. Jacobsen, Die Maler von Florenz zu Beginn der Renaissance. München-Berlin 2001, pp. 55-56.
17. P. Pastori (ed.), La festa di San Giovanni. Firenze 1997, pp. 70-79.

12
palio of Siena, destined to the winner. The palios, like the candles, formed a kind of forced offering by different municipalities under Florentine dominion and also by the lords of nominally independent territories that in some way were required to pay tribute to Florentine dominion; their numbers were quite high and not constant; in particular, with the passage of time the offering of the palios became gradually more prevalent than that of the candles. After the offering to the Signoria, the candles and the palios were carried in procession.
After the act of submission to the Signoria by the lands of the domain (significantly the only gesture of homage to the political authorities, since all the processions intended to glorify the patron saint), the crowded procession of the governing bodies, with all their own distinct symbols, which was divided into distinct segments, moved from the square: the procession opened with the Captains of the Guelph Party, preceded by their banner, and the Florentine knights, along with the ambassadors and foreign knights; there followed the Palio and the candles of wood and the torches and special offerings of candles by the citizens of villages kept in oblation; Then the Lords of the Mint with their wagon (a particularly elaborate candle), accompanied by the masters of the Arts of Calimala and Changers (directly responsible for the organization of the festival), each bearing a wax torch; then the Priors and the Colleges with the Podestà, Captain and Executor of the ordinances of justice together, for greater solemnity, with trumpets and fifes; last went to the offerings the racehorses [what barberi means, Franco tells me] of the Palio, the weavers of Flemish and Bramantine wool living in Florence, and twelve prisoners of the Stinche prison, freed by mercy "to the honor of St. John". (18)
The procession of the representatives of the various cities and castles moved along a traditional city itinerary.
Of the itinerary of the procession there are no precise indications, but from some data it may be assumed that it was from Santa Maria del Fiore by the Corso Adimari (Via Calzaioli), Piazza della Signoria, Via de Gondi, Piazza San Firenze e Apollinare, Badia, Via del Proconsolo, Canto dei Pazzi, Santa Maria in Campo, Duomo NW side, returning by San Giovanni and Santa Maria del Fiore. (19)
Of particular note is the participation at the festival of a variable number of "buildings", moveable wooden structures, often with a stage
______________
18. P. Ventrone, Annali di Storia di Firenze, II (2007): <http://www.dssg.unifi.it/SDF/annali/annali2007.htm>
19. L. Gori, Le feste etc., p. 24.

13
on which were placed some figures. According to Trexler the first evidence that we have - Gregorio Dati for the celebration of 1410 - is shortly after their introduction, which would have occurred with the initial participation of lay brotherhoods in the celebrations of the patron saint of Florence. On buildings in use at that time in Florence we can give the floor again to Paola Ventrone.
As for the buildings, carried on the shoulders of porters and not dragged on wheels as would take place in the triumphal chariots of later years, they reveal multiple uses and conformations. In episodes with just a few characters, like the Annunciation that only included the presence of Gabriel, Mary and angels, carrying the set along the way until the perfunctory stop in front of the Signoria; in the more complex representations of drama, proceeded, however, as empty of appointed places, preceded or followed by sumptuous cavalcades whose protagonists came up on stage only at the time of the dramatic action, as in the case of Moses, the prophets, Octavian, Herod with the Magi, and so on. They could also have a multiple structure, as in the Templum Pacis [Temple of Peace], which depicted on the lower floor a temple surrounded by columns within which had to be hidden the stable of the Nativity, and on the top children dressed as angels probably intended to accompany the prophetic vision of the Tiburtine Sibyl, with the Virgin and Child in a cloud.

Another testimony details the technical consistency of these devices in the years neighboring the Antonine reform [that Antoninus, 1389-1459. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoninus_of_Florence, Franco tells me]. In Roma thriumphans, composed by Flavio Biondo between 1457 and 1459, the Florentine festivals are likened to Roman triumphs and there is emphasized the artifice of 'trees' animated by children, which must have been a recurring theme in many buildings, both for choreographjc effect and for the astonishment evidently induced in the audience (20)
Unfortunately, we have little information on the details of the parade in the various years; we are interested in particular to know the number and type of buildings and their representations recited in front of the Signoria. We have a sufficiently precise list for 1454, as reproduced below, but the description is introduced precisely with the expression that in that "was changed the form of celebration", which leaves us in uncertainty as to what could be different in previous years that would be of interest for us. [Translator's note: since the Italian is archaic and a document, I give the original, with my attempt at a translation following.]
A dì 22.
  • Nel principio mosse la Croce di Santa Maria del Fiore, con tutti i loro cherici fanciulli, e rieto a loro sei cantori.
_________________
20. P. Ventrone, Teatro etc., pp. 201-202.

14
  • Secondo, le Compagnie di Jacopo cimatore e Nofri calzaiolo, con circa trenta fanciulli vestiti di bianco e angioletti.
  • Terzo, Edifizio di San Michel Agnolo; al quale soprastava Iddio Padre in una nuvola: e in Piazza, al dirimpetto a’ Signori, fecero rappresentazione della battaglia Angelica, quando Lucifero fu co’ sua agnoli maladetti cacciato di cielo.
  • Quarto, la Compagnia di ser Antonio e Piero di Mariano, con circa trenta fanciulli vestiti di bianco e agnoletti.
  • Quinto, l’Edifizio di Adamo; che in Piazza fe rappresentazione di quando Iddio creò Adamo e poi Eva, fe loro il comandamento, e la loro disobbedienza, infino a cacciarli di Paradiso, con la tentazione prima del serpente, et altre appartenenze.
  • Sesto, un Moísè a cavallo, con assai cavalleria di principali del popolo d’Israelle, ed altri.
  • Settimo, l’Edifizio di Moisè; il quale in Piazza fe la rappresentazione di quando Iddio li diè la legge.
  • Ottavo, più Profeti e Sibille, con Ermes e Trimegisto et altri Profetizzatori dell’incarnazione di Cristo.
  • Nono, l’Edifizio dell’Annunziata; che fe la sua rappresentazione.
  • Decimo, Ottaviano imperatore, con molta cavalleria, e con la Sibilla; per far rappresentazione quando la Sibilla li predisse doveva nascer Cristo, e mostrògli la Vergine in aria con Cristo in braccio. (...)
  • Undecimo, Templum pacis, con 1’Edi-fizio della Natività, per fare la sua rappresentazione.
  • Duodecimo, un magnifico e trionfal tempio per edifizio; nel qual tempio ottangolare ornato di sette Virtù intorno, e da oriente la Vergine con Cristo nato; e Erode intorno a detto tempio fe la sua rap-presentazione.
  • Tredicesimo, tre Magi, con cavalleria di più di dugento cavalli ornati molto magnificamente, vennono a offerta a Cristo nato. Tralasciossi la Passione e Sepoltura, perché non parve che si convenisse a festa.
  • Decimoquarto, una cavalleria di Pilato, ordinata in guardie del Sepolcro.
  • Decimoquinto, l’Edi-fizio della Sepoltura, onde resuscitò Cristo.
  • Decimosesto, l’Edifizio del Limbo, onde trasse i Santi Padri.
  • Decimosettimo, l’Edifizio del Paradiso, dove messe detti Santi Padri.
  • Decimottavo, gli Apostoli e le Marie che furon presenti all’Assunzione.
  • Decimonono, l’Edifizio dell’Assunzione di Cristo, cioè quando salì al cielo.
  • Ventesimo, cavalleria di tre Re, reine e damigelle e ninfe, con cani e altre appartenenze, al vivo.
  • Ventune-simo, l’Edifizio del Vivo e del Morto.
  • Vigesimosecondo, l’Edi-fizio del Giudizio, con barella de’ sepolcri, Paradiso, e Inferno; e sua rappresentazione, come per fede si crede sarà in fine de’ secoli.
  • Tutti i sopraddetti Edifizi ferono sua rappresentazione in Piazza innanzi a’ Signori; e durarono infino alle 16 ore.
(Of the 22.
  • First moves the Cross of Santa Maria del Fiore, with all its clergy children, and in behind their six singers.
_____________
20. P. Ventrone, Teatro etc., pp. 201-202.
.
14
  • Second, the Companies of Jacopo the shearer and Nofri the cobbler, with about thirty children dressed in white and angels.
  • Third, the Building of Saint Michael Angel, who was standing above God the Father in a cloud: and in the Piazza opposite to the Signoria, a depiction of the battle of the Angel was dones, when Lucifer with his accursed angels was kicked out of heaven.
  • Fourth, the Company di ser Piero and Antonio Mariano, with about thirty children-angels dressed in white.
  • Fifth, the Building of Adam; in the Piazza was depicted when God created Adam and then Eve, gave them the commandment, and their disobedience, also being expelled from Heaven, with the temptation of the snake before, and other things pertaining.
  • Sixth, Moses on horseback, with much cavalry, the leaders of the people of Israel, and others.
  • Seventh, the Building of Moses; which in the Piazza was representation of when God gave them the law.
  • Eighth, most of the Prophets and Sibyls, with Hermes Trismegistus and other Prophetizers of the incarnation of Christ.
  • Ninth, the Annunciation Building; and its representation.
  • Tenth, Emperor Octavian, with much cavalry, and the Sibyl; to make representations when the Sibyl foretold them Christ was to be born, and depiction the Virgin with Christ in her arms in the air. (...)
  • Eleventh, Templum Pacis, with the Building of the Nativity, to make its depiction.
  • Twelfth, a magnificent triumphal temple edifice; in which the ornate octagonal temple, seven Virtues around, and from the east the Virgin with Christ was born; and Herod around said temple was its depiction.
  • Thirteenth, the three Magi, with cavalry of more than two hundred horses decorated very beautifully, come to offer to the newborn Christ. Omitting the Passion and Burial, because it seemed inappropriate for the occasion.
  • Fourteenth, a cavalry of Pilate, ordered to guard the Sepulcher.
  • Fifteenth, the Edifice of Burial, where Christ was resurrected.
  • Sixteenth, the Building of Limbo, from where the Holy Fathers were taken.
  • Seventeenth, the Building of Paradise, where the Holy Fathers said Masses.
  • Eighteenth, the Apostles and Mary who have been present at the Assumption.
  • Nineteenth, the Building of the Assumption of Christ, that is, when he ascended to heaven.
  • Twentieth, three cavalry, King, Queen and maidens and nymphs, with dogs and others pertaining, living.
  • Twenty-first, the Building of the Living and the Dead.
  • Twenty-second the Building of Judgment, with the float of the sepulchers, Heaven, and Hell; and its representation, as by faith we believe will be the end of the centuries.
  • All the above mentioned buildings made their representations in the Piazza before the Signoria; and they lasted even to the 16th hour.) (21)

________________
21. C. Guasti, Le feste di San Giovanni... pp. 21-22.
15
A series of twenty-two scenes ending in the Judgment surely will surely summon the attention of some tarot historian, but to find convincing associations for twenty-two figures looks anything but easy.

8. Procession of the Magi

There is a rich bibliography on the Magi, with views that extend from blind credulity to full disbelief. It is pleasing to read studies that can at least bring some disrepute to authors in certain circles, but not to condemn them to the stake as would definitely have occurred a few centuries ago. Many of the complex historical issues affect us only marginally. On the origins of the Magi and on their historical setting I can gladly defer to a small book that was published from an academic lecture held a few years ago by Antonio Panaino (22); those who wished to go deeper can find discussed the most unexpected information (e.g. for me to read that someone has associated the pulsar PSR 1913 + 16b with the sacred comet) and above all a wealth of references, including very old studies. A serious discussion is also found in various publications by Franco Cardini, again highly academic, among which I have used especially those of 1993 (23) and 2011 (24); the second publication also includes an interesting proposal to revive the festive celebration at the city level.

As for the involvement of the neighboring towns, the procession of the Magi had a much lesser appeal than that of Saint John; in this ceremony only the most prominent city families were to "triumph" on the occasion, i.e. in this case, to celebrate themselves, showing themselves worthy of honor and respect on the part of ordinary citizens. For those who could afford it, it was a unique opportunity to circumvent the sumptuary laws and showcase gaudy attires and jewels of great value. It seems that the first procession of this
____________
22. A. Panaino, I magi evangelici. Ravenna 2004.
23. F. Cardini, La stella e i re. Firenze 1993.
24. F. Cardini, Il giglio, la stella e tre corone. Firenze 2011.

16
kind took place in 1390, with Baldassarre degli Ubriachi [Trans. note: Italian for “of the Drunkards”] as a promoter.

The pinnacle of that synthesis between chivalric-courtly imagination and religious cerimoniality, which also characterized the Medicean Florence of the Republican Age, is the "festival of the Magi”, as defined in the sources: one of the the oldest attested pageants, although its origins are still not fully understood. It was first heard of in 1390 (1389 s.f. [Florentine dating]) when, according to the striking - and very plausible, although conjectural - hypothesis of Richard Trexler, the rich Florentine merchant and banker Baldassarre degli Ubriachi wanted to celebrate in honor of his namesake saint, in a particularly salient personal fortune.

A man exceptionally versatile and enterprising in his youth, Ubriachi had exercised the profession of money-changer, under the shadow of [i.e. protection of, Franco tells me] the Papal Court of Avignon; in consequence he then made a fine cursus honorum with Emperor Charles IV, by whom in 1369 he was honored with the title of Count Palatine with the right to legitimize his bastard children. (25)

In the conduct of the procession celebrating a fixed point, it seems that it has always been the convent of San Marco, even before those Observant Dominicans were transferred there who made it famous, if only thanks to Savonarola. Initially it formed the starting location and also that of the final arrival of the procession, stopping in front of the Baptistery, where the palace of King Herod had been built, and then went on to the Piazza of the Signori, then returning to San Marco.
In December 1408 the Signoria stated that every year on the occasion of the Epiphany, the "Six of Merchandise" and the "Consuls of the Arts" were required to submit to the church of San Marco an oblation of wax Torchietti. As it is not known with documented certainty, it seems unwise to assume that the connection between Epiphany and the Church of San Marco was in fact made up of the ceremonial procession attested since 1390, and the details of the Signoria, which provided that making the tribute were the heads of the magistrates who presided over the economic and productive life of the city, he meant to read somehow the wise men in the key of "reason of merchandice". Gold, frankincense and myrrh, symbolic gifts at various levels, as we have seen were, among other things, goods. And the Magi, Patrons of anyone who was traveling, could not be, in a center like Florence, other than also the merchants. In 1417 the documents tell us with certainty that there had already formed a veritable "Compagnia de 'Magi'”, with the task of organizing every year the procession-show of the three kings through the city. (26)
___________________
25. P. Ventrone, Teatro etc.
26. F. Cardini, La stella etc., pp. 128-129.

17
The parade was enriched by the participation of many knights and the three wagons of the Magi, decorated with a wealth of products of Florentine manufacturers and fruits of the surrounding countryside, and all around accompanied on the journey by slaves dressed in oriental fashion. The wagons in most, or the buildings that were there, if they participated, were, however, much reduced in number.

The festival of the Magi was thus recurrently celebrated, but with variation in the magnificence of the celebrations, up to the extreme case of a complete suppression of the festival (to prevent possible related unrest) from 1419 to 1426, years that are in the period of our interest. The absence of celebrations in those years was partly offset by the amazing altarpiece that Gentile da Fabriano finished painting in 1423 for the Strozzi Chapel in Santa Trinita and which had great influence on some aspects of Florentine figurative art (understandably more on the minor works than on the masterpieces of the Renaissance).

The celebrations then continued with greater force until the intervention of the Medici, who came to extend the route of the procession, and then pass in front of their homes (which were in Via Larga even before they built the famous Palazzo) up to Herod's palace located then in the gardens of San Marco. For the wealth of attire the procession of the Magi long remained an important event and a great attraction for all citizens; only the most influential members could take part directly, but all citizens participated enthusiastically as spectators.

In the coming years, the Ludus Magorum left, in Florence, a deep and lasting impression, because the depiction of royalty, marked by that exquisitely gothic taste that Baldassarre had breathed following the Emperor and had assimilated impregnandone their ivory artifacts, remained impressed as much in the imagination of the ruling elite, as in that of the local community which drew, in turn, economic benefit and enjoyment from being involved in the organization of the event, whether paying for the artisanal work of its workshops, or enjoying the view.
____________
27. P. Ventrone, Teatro etc., p. 89.

18
On the composition of the procession we have information especially on the parade of knights, but some reports indicate the occasional presence of special personages and machines, in addition to the three carts of the Magi, but again much reduced in number.
The Company contributed to the festival of Saint John in 1428 with a retinue the main character of which was "one old man in white beard and clothed in gold brocade". Indeed, one gets the impression that the various processions that in Florence were held in the carnival period, then in early spring, thus the end of June for the festivities of patron John the Baptist, were now opportunities to show off scenes and allegories of various kinds, without direct reference (or in any case not with exclusive reference) to the festival that from time to time was solemnized. So also the procession of the Magi should not be focused only on them. At Epiphany of 1429 the stage of Herod the king had been erected in the Piazza of the Signoria while another stage was erected in Piazza San Marco for the Virgin and Child. In the afternoon there was the real cortege with about seven hundred people on horseback, among whom the magi and their companions, apparently members of the "Compagnia de 'Magi". However, various personages were also part of the procession, such as three giants, a "wild man", and a wagon with David who struck Goliath with a slingshot. (28)
9. Search for plausible associations

Having summarized the civic events that in various ways and measures were characterized with triumphal motifs, we may review some aspects in the search for possible links with those triumphs that appeared, at least from 1440, but probably before, in playing cards.

The procession of Saint John, we have seen, was not a few personages or scenes with characters parading, but were the representatives of many communities proceeding one after another. It is understandable that those solemn processions must have respected an order of advancement in ranks, such that it could be put in relationship with the requirement necessary for playing cards whose hierarchical power had to be recognized immediately, before it was shown by special numbers of the order imprinted on the card. But in this case it is precisely the number of individuals making the two situations incomparable; in the processions of Saint John and the Magi hundreds of characters paraded; participants of those processions were in short too
______________
28. F. Cardini, La stella etc., p. 129.

19
numerous for any attempt at individual association, and eventually some homogeneous groups must be isolated that paraded together.

Some possibilities, also in these cases, remain open in searching for possible associations among groups of subjects and corresponding representations. Let us review the celebrations of St. John. We have to start the day before, but the two events in the morning do not appear useful elements: the exhibition was offered to the sight of passers-by of a very large number of valuable goods, but a sequence of the type sought could not exist for those - nor for the shops. even if somehow "triumphant". Some sequence could be made out for all the little bones of saints, virgins and martyrs, transported under the golden canopy of the religious procession, but even among those would not be easy to discern an ordered set, let alone a list ordered by value.

The most obvious and secure aspect is the presence in the evening procession of representatives of the sixteen separate urban districts in which the city was divided, four in each district, as follows: Santa Maria Novella: Viper, Unicorn, Red Lion, White Lion: San Giovanni: Gold Lion, Green Dragon, Keys, Vaio [grey fur of the Siberian squirrel, very fine, Franco tells me]; Santa Croce: Chariot, Ox , Black Lion, Wheel; Santo Spirito: Ladder, Shell, Ferza [a kind of whip, Franco tells me], Dragon. Clearly, only for the Florentines would it have been possible to identify a sequential order for all sixteen banners; the sixteen symbols corresponding to the names indicated above do not lend themselves at all to constituting an ordered scale of values. For the position in the procession of each banner there was an established order with the priorities to be respected; we do not know if it was fixed once and for all, or if it was changed more or less frequently, but we can imagine that it generated fierce debates.

We thus come to equating the number of subjects involved with the high cards in the deck of the triumphs of Marziano, which can appear as a considerable advance. Thinking about the triumphs of Marziano, the analogy is immediate and profound: the four quarters correspond to the four suits of the deck and the 4x4 banners to his divinities. It is noteworthy that in both cases there is a breakdown of sixteen elements into four groups, a similarly not in immediate numerical order from 1 to 16; neither of the two sequences presented per se as a clear ranking of power. The order had to be set out explicitly in the case of Marziano, and in the other from preliminary agreements among citizens. However, it remains very difficult to find

20
any association between the signs of the sixteen banners that advance in beautiful display in parades and the sixteen divinities of Marziano, or even sixteen other triumphal cards sometimes considered at the origin of the tarot.

As for the number of groups involved in the processions, we can consider another that will appeal to lovers of the tarot, twenty-one, provided you take into consideration previous periods. It is true that the standard tarot series is of twenty-two cards, but often it is suggested that the Fool, with its special role in the game, was only added at a later time. In preceding times the parades of banners existed in which the arts that comprised all the work activities of the city were twenty-one, parading separately one after the other. Each art had among other things its own symbol; but these do not lend themselves in any way to being associated with the cards of the tarot, or, if one deems it useful, with the deities of Marziano.

Regrding June 24, St. John's Day, we can neglect the afternoon race because a fixed number and order of the participants did not exist; However, the morning procession was the most important event of all. Despite the large number of participants, it seems in particular that the number of larger "buildings" was limited to a dozen. We can then look in the memories of the time for traces of the buildings with the same triumphal parade motifs that we know from other events and the minor arts. Also in this case, various problems are encountered in confining ourselves strictly to the time of interest; sometimes information received from later times is in fact used, in the belief that traditional practices were being perpetuated, already existing in the period of our interest. Thus we know biblical scenes were often represented on the buildings, but to make a concrete list, usually lists compiled for later times are used. A list for the case found closest to the time of interest was presented in the previous description of the event.

Inasmuch as a set of biblical events is only partly comparable with the succession of triumphs that we are searching for, we must also recognize in these processions the possible character of a sequence of events chosen to represent episodes of a story, albeit the most frequently illustrated ones appear to have remained purely within the biblical environment. The episodes could be presented in order, that is, so that what followed in the procession clearly corresponded to a succeeding event. Then it is possible that

21
in the procession there were just sequences of scenes such as those we are looking for. Unfortunately, the evidence is not sufficiently precise. and the number of these elements remains uncertain; sometimes ten or nearby numbers, but also more, up to the 22 of the tarot, but appearing at a later date than "our" 1440.

In the face of cases of this kind we should also distinguish the event by the name of triumphs: let us imagine a deck of cards in which as superior cards other cards were added of biblical episodes or of any other nature, provided they are clearly identified as belonging to a particular order; these cards indeed could be used as a triumphal cards, before the name of triumphs became suitable to indicate them. The matter is complicated, but would follow a logical path that would have in the triumphs of Marziano a solid illustrative example.

A different hypothesis can be gained by imagining that on a given occasion each group had chosen an extraordinary figure represent, only in that specific circumstance. The same applies to the figures of the palios: it can be hypothesize that a correspondence between tarot figures and those of the palios had been established in a particular year and that precisely in that year the palios had been decorated with the figures we only know from playing cards. It is, however, in the final analysis an implausible reconstruction, precisely because of the traditional and repetitive character of those recurrent celebrations.

Also for the Magi very decisive dates appear: it was already in full affirmation by the Medici when the procession of the Magi became a very rich event, celebrated without interruptions or reductions in the festivities. Indeed it was precisely the Medici who reorganized it and extended it; but at that time our triumph cards were already in use in the city and also produced for export. First, in the period of our interest, the subjects that can be taken into account for comparison with the playing cards were either too many or too few, whether individuals, buildings or carts. If in the procession of the Magi several celebratory "buildings" of a truimphant type had been present, one could try to establish some correspondence with the trophies of our interest. However, besides the carts of the Magi, for us insufficiently numbering three, I have found few useful traces in the memories preserved in this regard.

22
10. Conclusion

With reference to Florence in the first half of the fifteenth century, the events of the city were examined so as to possibly connect with and explain the appearance of the triumphs in playing cards. Particular attention was dedicated to the two typical Florentine processions of St. John the Baptist and the Magi, which took place annually on the relevant anniversaries of June 24 and January 6. Looking for possible ideas for the triumphal figures that appeared among the playing cards in 1440 or a few years before, no case was found of a perfect match for the various associations considered. Navigating so in the dark, any flicker is welcome, but one cannot see a way to continue without hesitation; We must however not forget the fact - the more positive and encouraging for future researches - that in these cases, unlike the others previously studied, at least the dates are proportionate with what is being searched for.

Franco Pratesi – 10.11.2016

 Comments on "Ca. 1450: Civic Processions"
(by Michael S. Howard)

It seems to that the material in Franco's note might be more illuminating than he perhaps gives it credit at the end.

It is clear that actual processions did not give rise to the trumphal subjects of the tarot. Among processions, it is only the imaginary ones of Petrarch that can do so, at least for some of the subjects. Already believing this, I found myself becoming impatient with Pratesi. Why does he bother dredging up all these non-starters, when the processions that are relevant are right there in the poem itself?

However in retrospect a a few points are in fact clearer. Only one of his examples actually relates to specific cards of the tarot. But two others also relate, in terms of getting people used to the tarot’s type of structure.

The example that suggests actual cards is of course the Florentne-run truimphal parade in Naples (p. 7 above), with its seven virtues, fortune, and Caesar. These do indeed suggest cards that were probably present in the Florentine tarot of that time. It is true that the seven virtues were a common group everywhere then. But coupling them with Caesar, a Roman term for the Emperor, and Fortune was not common at all. It would have been even rarer to see them together as “triumphal” subjects. We have 9 cards.

Regarding the structure, Franco has already analyzed the example of the 16 banners, in a 4x4 array (p. 20). That structure might explain how it was that Marziano came up with the idea for his game. It was then only a matter of coming up with 16 classical subjects that could be put in a similar 4x4 array. These could then serve both as additional cards in each of the four suits, higher than the Kings, and as a suit in itself. A familiarity with the 4x4 array of banners might well have led to the 4x4 array of cards.

Such familiarity would also facilitate Florentnes’ ability to understand and appreciate a game with such an array. Each group would have a leader, similar to the four quarters of Sainta Maria Novella, San Giovanni, Santa Croce, and Santo Spirito. Within each group there would be a stipulated hierarchy, and the groups would also be arranged hierarchically. This would be something readily understood. The only odd part is that Marziano’s groups do not succeed each other, but rather the 2nd members of the groups succeed the 1st members (see the table at the beginning of http://trionfi.com/olympic-gods). That would take some getting used to. But I doubt if Marziano’s game ever made it to Florence.

I have suggested that the CY was conceived on such a 4x4 principle. There is good evidence for that hypothesis, in that the 11 triumph cards came to the Beinecke actually assigned each to one of the four suits That is a type of assignment that has not existed in card games since at least 1450, with Marcello’s letter (I think it is safe to assume that Marziano’s game never caught on in Anjou), and the assignments do not resemble any tarot order. Below, the titles in capitals have the suit assignments given in the Beinecke (S=Swords, B=Batons, C=Cups, D=Coins). The ones in italics are my guesses. I do not know whether the order of the suits here was part of what was received by the Beinecke or not. I list them in the same order they do.
Image
I have suggested a rationale for the assignments, the principle of each group (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16) being related to one of the four cardinal virtues. The hierarchy of the groups, I have speculated, was determined by something else, namely the order of the 6 Petrarchan triumphs that appear in them. Something like that order, in at least 5 of the 6 corresponding early cards, does show traces in the existing subjects and their order (time, if the man with the hourglass, would be out of place). And of relevance to the St. John’s Day Parade, the groups succeed each other as groups, not as individuals whose value is determined by their place in their group. This is something that can continue to be true, as the triumphs expand to 22.

Another thing the processions teach is how to recognize a story from the succession of events in it, and vice versa, how to remember the order of given events by knowing the story of which these events form a part. The order of the series of 22 floats can be remembered largely in terms of the order of the biblical story that they represent, a story everyone participating would have known. At the same time the procession teaches that not all the items in a triumphal series have to fit the story. Some of the 22 in the procession do not stand for biblical events. It begins (p. 14):
First moves the Cross of Santa Maria del Fiore, with all its clergy children, and in behind their six singers.
Second, the Companies of Jacapo the shearer and Nofri the cobbler, with about thirty children dressed in white and angels.
Third, the Building of Saint Michael Angel, who was standing above God the Father in a cloud: and in the Piazza opposite to the Signoria, a depiction of the battle of the Angel was dones, when Lucifer with his accursed angels was kicked out of heaven.
It is only with the third group that the story begins. The others were perhaps to let the crowd know that the parade was starting, like when a movie begins with a bunch of credits.

In that sense any story provides the means for knowng the order of given events within it. It is not necessary that each overcome the one before it. But this story is called “triumphs”. What makes the story triumphal, if not triumphing over what came before? One answer might be: the nature of the subjects themselves: the virtues do not triumph over one another, but they are triumphal—over the vices. Likewise, it might be said that the Bible is the story of God’s triumphs, and that each of the carts in the parade just cited represents one of them. The tarot, too, can be seen as god’s triumphs.

But let us suppose that the tarot isn’t about God, but about the human soul in relation to God. In that way it would be like the images conjured up by Petrarch in his Triumphi. Again, it is groups of cards that triumph over other groups of cards, like the Petrarchan triumphs including the people associated with them. There is one card for the Petrarchan/Boccaccian triumph, and other cards in the group are like the people following the cart. This is a scenario that fits the sequence whether it is as few as 6 cards (the Petrarchan ones) or as many as 22. The Saint John’s Day procession accustoms people to that structure, no matter how many groups it has, whether 10 or 22, and how many people are in the various groups.

We can even change the story so that it is not Petrarch’s any longer, but a slight variation (putting Time earlier). It still just requires knowing the story that applies. Here is an example, using the same 16 cards as before but in the minchiate order (I owe this table to Franco, although not quite what I am doing with it; I hope you are noticing the overlap with the Naples group of 9). Here the idea of "groups of 4" still applies, using 4 four of the 6 Petrarchans to govern a group: Love, Chastity, Death, and Eternity.
Image
We start out as the Empress or Emperor of our souls. We experience desire (Amor) in various ways and need the moral virtues of Temperance, Fortitude, and Justice, in order to steer the Chariot of our soul in relation to the ups and downs of Fortune. Growing Old, we know we will be defeated at least temporarily by Death. But what will defeat death is Faith, which gives us Hope that the goal that Prudence enables us to recognize will be attained with God’s charity, leading us to Glory when the Angel blows his trumpet.

This is a kind of simple catechism or “Hail Mary” rosary prayer to be learned in playing the game. It does not have to be taught; people can figure it out, or something like what I wrote, for themselves. Something of the sort is drummed into one's consciousness however the sequence is learned.The processions, with their religious emphasis, and other imagery around them, have made it easy.

The story I have imagined does not quite fit Petrarch’s order of triumphs. If we substitute the Star, Moon, and Sun for prudence and the three theological virtues the poem fits much better, in the way that John Shephard outlines in his table (see viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1120&start=40#p17956), with the Bagat, I think, more a tempter than a guide.

Monday, November 7, 2016

Oct. 15, 2016: Ca. 1450: Triumphs and Triumphi

Translator's Introduction
(by Michael S. Howard)

Here I present, Franco's "1450ca: Trionfi e Triumphi", http://www.naibi.net/A/521-PETRAR-Z.pdf, in English translation, which I first posted at http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1092&start=20#p17714. It is the third in a series, of which the earlier were on birth trays and marriage chests. Comments in brackets are mine. I have not discussed the translation with Franco, so revisions may follow. I have put some of my own comments on this note after the translation.

Ca. 1450: Triumphs and Triumphi
(by Franco Pratesi)

Petrarch's poem Triumphi ["Triumphi" in Latin, "I Trionfi" in Italian, "The Triumphs" in English] was composed over several decades and remained unfinished at his death in 1374. The triumphs, chosen so that the next succeeds in surpassing the previous one, are known as the following six: Love, Chastity, Death, Fame, Time, and Eternity. We are interested in their possible connection with the triumphal tarot cards. With reference to playing cards, precisely Francesco Petrarch is often quoted, but for another reason: as evidence that the cards had not yet been introduced in Europe by 1366, when he finished the De remediis utriusque fortunae; In fact, the cards do not appear in this work that indeed considers many games. The first documented information on cards is a few years later, in Florence of1377. Afterwards, the triumphs were also introduced, as the special playing cards, better known later as trionfi [tarots]; the first attestation of trionfi known today is that of 1440 in Florence.

Playing cards and card games have never, or almost never, been the subject of academic study, and most of the contributions in this regard are by collectors or amateur historians. If anyone wants to find out about any particular topic and does not find texts on an academic level, reading the writings of amateurs or discussions on the web becomes the only way to learn more about them.

The case of the Triumphi is different from the usual, because it concerns a field that in academia has developed in depth, albeit without explicit references to card games. Among amateurs, we observe some interest in this subject; one thinks he has discovered an unknown detail, and yet he could find the information - even quite easily with current literature-search techniques - in dozens of previous publications of scholars of literature or art history at the professional level. It then happens inevitably that, speaking of the Triumphi at an amateur level, albeit for possible

2
links with playing cards, often to sensitive ears echoes the classic: et ultra crepidam! Here the sources are there, it is only to know how to look for them. Then, while belonging to the amateur category, I tried to make myself informed about the results of university research, and I can report a few things about them, including some fundamental contributions to the subject.

I had studied the Triumphi already thirty years ago, but I had not arrived at a sufficiently defined vision. Taking up the matter again, I found of my interest a catalog with contributions by various authors (1), because it is recent, this fact is reflected in the utility of its bibliography: taking its cue from work of the past with later times it becomes less likely that fundamental studies on the subject will escape our attention. The contribution by Loredana Chines, "I 'Trionfi' di Petrarca", on pp. 17-20 of the work cited, would be of interest in itself, but I was particularly struck with the way in which in this regard the works of Marcello Ciccuto are cited, whom I did not know.
On the importance of the antecedents of the Giotto cycles of Castelnuovo (paintings for Robert of Anjou) and Milan (for Azzone Visconti) for the illustres viri of Petrarch and the relationship between the Petrarchan text and iconographic texts, see the fundamental contributions of M. Ciccuto, “Trionfi” e “Uomini illustri” fra Roberto e Renato d’Angiò, in «Studi sul Boccaccio», XVII, 1988, pp. 343-402; the same, Figure di Petrarca (Giotto, Simone Martini, Franco Bolognese), Naples 1991, in particular pp. 5-77; the same, Per l’origine dei Trionfi, in «Quaderni d’Italianistica», XII, n. 1, 1991, pp. 7-20.
This is not of one citation, but of three publications that are indicated as resolving an issue that concerns us closely, the relationship between the text and the images; the first study was published in an Italian academic collection, the second in a book by the same author, and the third in an Italian journal printed in Toronto. I could not give up the search without reading these contributions, presented as fundamental, although finding two of them was not a simple
__________________
1. S. Cavicchioli, M. Rossi (ed.), Trionfi. Carpi 2014

3
task, because they are works not present in many libraries, and because they demand the same reading. Fortunately, reading all three fundamental contributions has at least the reward of being able to note that these contributions are not three, but one. The text published in Canada is a broad summary, while the differences between that in the Italian journal and in the book are undetectable. In short, even as the author warns us that he revised his text for publication in the book, it is recommended not to look at the two journals and read the monograph only.

Reading this part of the book (which contains later another couple of contributions of no interest to the matter) is highly recommended to any amateur who wishes to take the floor on the triumphs, both of cards and especially on Petrarca. Actually I do not know how many readers will be able to be convinced of the validity of this author’s work, in addition to Chines, but it is easy to see that at least the author was really convinced, seeing as he has made it public.

If, as is known, academic books of a "scientific" type distinguish themselves by notes, filling the bottoms of pages with smaller fonts and smaller distance between the lines, this work deserves a fair recognition in its environment, such as others do not receive. In his book, I could find no page without notes; 17 notes out of 73 are whole pages filled with reduced characters; and of pages in which the upper part of the text is more extensive than the bottom, with notes stuffed with bibliographic references, I counted only two. Arriving at Note 43, which alone takes up two pages, I thought I had identified the longest, but I had not yet met note 46 which by itself takes care of nine pages. How does any amateur put his mouth [keyboard?] to the subject, after this exhibition of scientific superiority? To compete in the scientific field one should have recourse, as a minimum, to partial differential equation.

As for me, I had the book on loan for a month, but I did not put it in the usual place on the bedside table; I did not want to ascertain its influence on my sleep, unsure if I would reconciled or if it would keep me awake and agitated for a long time. I am a little disappointed because many details have escaped me, perhaps important ones. I realized, however, that this contribution is not what I was looking for. I was interested mainly in the difference between the known broad circulation

4
of the Triumphi in Florence in illuminated manuscripts of the second half of the fifteenth century and those manuscripts of the previous half century, less known, less attended, without illustrations, also looking for elements of a discussion regarding the triumphs following in hierarchical order.

Here the Florentine environment is not seen any longer; going back in time, the setting is much broader and instead emphasizes the fundamental contributions of other cities such as Milan, Naples, Padua and beyond; understandably, going back to the beginning of the triumphal personages, Giotto often appears in the discourse, as far as could be seen or expressed, in fact, in Milan, Padua and Naples. It is not possible to assess whether the net weight of the Ciccuto contribution was really decisive. Among other things, I have not found any particular comment on the sequence of the Triumphi, such that each element prevails over the previous one; it may be that it is spoken of in some other widely known note, but it seems to me that this feature is not discussed in the previous examples.

Then I prefer to look for other high-level studies. In particular, I like to point to that of Ida Giovanna Rao (2), which has two unusual advantages: on the one hand it is as short, clear and as complete as required; on the other, it takes great responsibility, the kind you would want to meet more often: she has the courage to give us a list of publications on the same subject. So far it seems the least we can find in any serious study, but the selection proposed is explicitly suggested as a list of works that have brought an original contribution.
In the Bibliography, in itself very abundant, is reported only those that gradually over time have proven very significant or innovative than previous ones, as well as reporting the most recent contributions on the codices provided on the occasions of the exhibitions of the last decade.
If only the long bibliographies of these scholars could melt down so as to adopt the same policy! I prefer not to copy here the list in question only because it focuses, as indeed does the whole book, especially on the manuscript of the Triumphi under examination, Laurentian Strozzi 174, and does not pretend to cover the sector in general.
___________________
2. I. G. Rao (ed.), Francesco Petrarca, i Trionfi. Castelvetro di Modena 2012.

5
3. Discussions by scholars

Despite the huge amount of publications on the Triumphi and more or less accurate editions of the text, a real critical edition has not yet appeared (unless it was printed in the last few days without my knowledge). It is said in several publications that for many years Emilio Pasquini is preparing one. In the meantime, a study by Gemma Guerrini surveys of over four hundred codicologically preserved Italian manuscripts (3); the merit of this work goes beyond the task of cataloging the many copies, which would already be difficult, and is a serious attempt to compare them, sort them and group them depending on their finer features, obtainable especially from the script, but not only that. Several major studies have been on the other hand dedicated to the fortune of the Triumphi among the incunabula and the sixteenth century; However, the introduction of printing took place after the period of our interest; for the Triumphi in printed books, it is enough to cite one of the most significant studies. (4)

All or most academic studies understandably turn great attention to the possible sources of Petrarch, both for the whole of his triumphs, and especially for the detailed description of each. It seems to me that the two references from the past with the greatest interest are those that put the work in connection with the other two greats that lie at the basis of Italian literature, Dante and Boccaccio.

As for Dante, they rarely discuss parallel content, although sometimes they recall also some of the Dantesque visions of the Paradiso or other works. More than anything else Dante becomes involved for his style, beginning with the adoption in the Triumphi of the same tercet of the Commedia, anything but common in previous productions of Petrarch. From Dante, Petrarch, however, resumed here in part the common speech. Often it is said that Petrarch wrote for the princely courts and Dante to the people; only Petrarch could discipline his verses, so long and so deeply, with countless corrections over the years, so much so that his thematic and stylistic refinement was imitated for centuries; compared to him Dante was almost an improviser
_______________
3. G. Guerrini, Scrittura e civiltà, 10 (1986) 121-197.
4. C. Dionisotti, Italia medioevale e umanistica, 17 (1974) 61-113.

6
who composed for quite ignorant readers (and listeners, probably even more numerous). Well, technically speaking, Petrarch in his later years adopted a style that, if it was not exactly Dante’s, surely approached his much more than all his previous poetry.

If the contact with Dante was indirect and questionable, that with Boccaccio was real and repeated. Most frequently mentioned is the Amorosa Visione and the meetings that the two great writers had in person. The discussion among scholars today mainly concerns the details and the precise extent to the Amorosa Visione and the Triumphi influenced each other, until eventually in the first poem is found the origin of the second. For literature these problems are very important, but the repercussions for our question of the origin of the triumphs-cards is poor: it is true that to pass from just six triumphs of Petrarch to the number of those extractable from Boccaccio's poem can facilitate the attainment of the fateful number of twenty-two triumphal tarots, but in fact the figures described clearly in the Amorosa Visione are actually fewer than the six of Petrarch and all the other factors determining - virtually at will - the many supporting characters.

Although this is a well known fact mentioned by all the commentators, I have not found studies that are dedicated in particular to the structure of Triumphi as elements that surpass, and even more generally to the study of what had precede them - except for some vague references to the Psychomachia of Prudentius - and what were later imitations, not of individual examples, but the complete set (perhaps with the same extensions that would be useful for our particular purposes).

4. Discussions by art historians

Also in the treatises, monographs and periodicals of art history, you can find thousands of contributions on the individual triumphs introduced by Petrarch and the manner of depicting them. The thing can become very useful for those who are attracted by the tarots, because some of the figures coincide. We admit that one, perhaps for some the only one discernible, is the Triumph of Death. Well, it will certainly be useful to find high-level scientific studies on that figure, its origin, its variants, on the success it had at the time

7
and also later. Of the sources to be examined for an investigation of this type there is no limit.

Before - and in my case instead of - going into the details of the individual depictions, we immediately meet a serious problem that involves all of the figures of Petrarch's triumphs, or at least all but the first, the Triumph of Love. This surprising fact can be seen as the result of two unexpected observations: the figures that illustrate the Triumphi do not match their description in the poet’s verses; also the choice of how to complete the illustration is not left from time to time to the painter's imagination but follows virtually a fixed pattern.

That the figures are not drawn according to the text is seen at first glance, even without placing one’s attention on the many details that would confirm that conclusion, by the very fact that all the triumphs are presented with triumphal carts pulled by pairs of animals, while in the poems only the first triumph is described that way. That the scheme of pictorial representations is shown repeatedly without significant changes can go to confirm a hypothesis that was advanced in the first study that seriously addressed the problem: all known miniature cycles would be derived from a prototype now missing.

A second hypothesis, put forward shortly after, instead saw the Triumphi as derived from triumphal processions (6). The question is not a minor one and has been discussed at length; for those wishing to reconstruct the essential features I find nothing better than to go back to a book already mentioned. This time the contribution is by Ada Labriola in her study that already shows itself of interest from its title (7). The contribution is devoted primarily to the already mentioned Laurentian manuscript, with its beautiful miniatures by Apollonio di Giovanni, but also examines the background and general context, in a concise, dry style, very rare among historians. For the question now recalled, the suggestion is as follows.
In the vast bibliography on these issues, the following studies should be at least mentioned: Carandente 1963; Salmi 1976, pp. 23-47; Malke 1977 pp. 236-261 (which considers a lost fresco-prototype); Trapp 1992-1993, pp. 11-73; Ortner 1998 and 1999, pp. 81-96; Battaglia Ricci 1999, pp. 255-295; Banzato,
_____________________
5. V. M. Essling, E. Müntz, Pétrarque, ses études d’art, son influence sur les artistes, ses portraits et ceux de Laure. Paris 1902.
6. W. Weisbach, Repertorium für Kunstwissenschaft, 26 (1903/04) 226-287.
7. A. Labriola, Da Padova a Firenze: l’illustrazione dei Trionfi. Ref. 2, pp. 59-115

8
Limentani Virdis 2006, pp. 107-123; Prieto Gilday 2007; Malquori 2010, pp. 79-87.
There can also be indicated in this regard a brief contribution by Esther Nyholm, summarizing the issues well (8). They may seem as numerous as the studies on the subject, but they are no more than a small part of the bibliography, and finding them already selected as essential can be of considerable help.

5. interdisciplinary level discussions


The contributions of the historians of art and literature can, and indeed must, be combined, at least in this case; there may also be contributions from other disciplines. The most interesting work in this direction that I know is the thesis of Alexandra Ortner (9); it is a beautiful collection that brings together nearly five hundred pages of results that would otherwise require the consultation of works from numerous disciplines. The main merit of this author, briefly, is to combine, in triumph after triumph, what is known separately from authors who are interested in literature, art historians (ranging from illuminations to marriage chests [cassoni] and birth trays), and even historians of the theater, public events and ceremonies of the time.

For our particular purpose of tracing the series of twenty-two triumphal cards, already the combination of all six Petrarchan triumphs appears very limited; at the least an overview of the combination of the whole group would be useful, in so far as it then remains insufficient. It is true that many devotees of the tarot are deeply interested in the deeper meaning of each of the "major arcana", but for my part I find more interesting problems that concern the whole series, however reduced.

We would, in short, want another step forward, extending Ortner’s approach to all the elements, seen, however, not statically but in dynamic way. I mean to say that (at least for us amateur
____________
8. K. Eisenbichler, A.A. Iannucci (Editors), Petrarch’s Triumphs. Allegory and Spectacle. Ottawa 1990.
9. A. Ortner, Petrarcas “Trionfi” in Malerei, Dichtung und Festkultur. Weimar 1998.

9
historians of playing cards) it is essential to reconstruct in context the movement of the personages, one exiting while another takes over; there is necessarily a precise order to be respected. It ends up explaining very well why the majority of authors have put the Triumphi in relation with processions, and in particular with triumphal parades of floats.

It would be enough to find a parade in which the carts were dedicated precisely to the six Petrarchan triumphs, and an excellent candidate would be identified for the inspiration of both the Triumphi and, similarly, our triumphs-cards. This logical hypothetical step, which is also suggested repeatedly in the literature, appears contrary to reality (as often happens for the reconstructions based on the logical distance of centuries): it may happen to find traces of parades inspired by the Triumphi, and even by tarot cards, but not vice versa.

6. Petrarch and Triumphi in Florence in the early fifteenth century


Several studies have found that in the first half of the fifteenth century the spread of manuscripts of Petrarch's works among the Florentine citizenship was rather marginal in comparison to the works of Dante and Boccaccio, after which the works of Petrarch, starting precisely with the Triumphi, were to take over. In this regard, of particular interest are the findings of Christiana Bec’s studies on the libraries of the families of merchants, with a clear distinction between the two halves of the century (10).
In the Florence of the Medici, the teachings of contemporary history and the humanists brought profound consequences. The merchants and the upper middle class [alti borgesi] have given up some of their "civic" inspiration readings and both renewed and enriched their libraries, showing a strong interest for works of classical authors, for Petrarch and and for modern writers. Therefore, if the Florentine public of the early fifteenth century opens itself, as we have attempted to show elsewhere, the cultural renewal of his time and determines it to a certain extent, the rich merchants of the second half of the century participate directly in literary humanism and interest themselves in contemporary book production. Florentine writers and humanists of the fifteenth century enjoy a wider audience than the medieval thinkers in that they are "intended"
___________________
10. Ch. Bec, Cultura e società a Firenze nell'età della Rinascenza. Rome 1981, p. 18.

10
not only for professional scholars but for "honnêtes gens" [honest people]. In the Quatrocento [15th century], in short, culture comes out of the cloisters and the university to enter the shops and merchants’ palaces.
More recent studies have reassessed the importance of Petrarch also for the previous period, toward the conclusion that some of his writings had a considerable dissemination in the mercantile environment even before the development of humanism (11).
... A political interpretation of certain texts of Petrarch, as witnessed in manuscripts for the most part only by the fifteenth century, probably also occurred in Florence in the late fourteenth century, at least in the circle that revolves around Luigi Marsili; this Florence, however, is not yet the Florence of the humanists, but just that of the merchants.
Also, knowledge in Florence of the Triumphi in particular advanced quickly, but only in the narrow circles of the early humanists and their friends, including merchants. This type of diffusion among a few experts on the matter persisted, even for decades, after the poet's death. The manuscript copies that circulated were unpretentious and without illustrations, often personally copied by humanists and some merchants, without the involvement of scribes, much less illuminators. It was the rule of the miscellanies, where the Triumphi could be seen with other writings on various subjects. For decades, the text of the poem is separated from the cycle of illustrations, which then will accompany it. In the study just cited this change is taken into account, described as follows.
Thanks to the use of the tercet and its mythological and allegorical content, which lends itself well to a moral interpretation, the Triumphi enjoy some fortune not only among the humanists, but also among the merchants. According to the studies of Guerrini, the work is copied by merchants throughout the fifteenth century, especially in Tuscany, Veneto and Emilia (the oldest dated merchant’s codex, Ricc. 1127, dates back to 1417); subscripts also show that almost always copying is not by commission, but by private agreement. Rather bare from the viewpoint of decoration, these codcices leave wide margins around the text, evidently intended for corrections and reading notes. In most cases the work is accompanied by extensive poetry anthologies, with texts by Dante and Petrarch, Boccaccio more rarely, and minor
_________________
11. S. Brambilla, Verbum. Analecta neolatina, VII/I (2005) 185-219.

11
authors; in others, the Triumphi are united with religious texts, moral or devotional, traditionally close to the interests of the merchants; in still others of didactic texts, prayers and vernacular letters, sometimes about politics, which we will see in part accompanied by at least one other work of Petrarch, the Fam. XII 2, in the vernacular. Going forward to the second half of the century, however, codices contain only written Petrarchian writings or those related to Petrarch, like the Life by Leonardo Bruni. They are modeled on similar examples of luxury codices, humanistic monographs, and at least in part testify to the influence of the most advanced culture also on products destined for a different audience.
Indeed, as also recognized in the citation, great credit needs to be to given to the previous studies by Gemma Guerrini, which are based on the meticulous examination of many of the fifteenth-century manuscripts of the Triumphi. In addition to the more extensive one already mentioned, another article cannot be forgotten, in which she presents the question from several points of view, bringing the analysis to a conclusion that, although not defined as final, certainly does not appear rushed (12).
... The presence of the texts examined above along with the Triumphi, in exemplars of merchants’ manuscripts, appears to constitute a very significant presence if not as regards the social and economic class of the users of these miscellanees, certainly for their culture and approaching that of type in which they had as subjects the Triumphi of Petrarch. ... It can be said in the meantime, and with all certainty, that the Triumphi in the fifteenth century were read and also enjoyed by those not belonging to the culturally hegemonic classes, aswritings in merchants’ copies; Individuals belonging, therefore, to a median section of society, among the oral culture of the illiterate and that belonging to the culture of dominant classes transmitted through writing. As indicated by the manuscripts studied, the writers in the merchants’ libraries tend toward conscious assimilation of the type of book and text used by the humanistic culture, conceived in fact as "the" culture. ... Another group of manuscripts in those of the merchants have, instead, both texts contemporary to the manuscripts and older ones, mostly compilations and vulgarizations dating back to the 1200s and the 1300s. The analysis of these miscellanies and affinities among the texts included there with the text of the Triumphi, made possible and documented the reading that Petrarch's work was being done, a use with care now to moral content, now to devotion, now teaching, now consolation; such enjoyment of the work of Petrarch, united with a subordinate graphic typology and other elements presented by the manuscripts (misunderstandings of the text, ignorance of Latin, the rough or archaic style decorations), does not provide support beyond certain limits of the influence of humanistic culture on the production of the latter, so if the comparison between the texts together with exemplars of Triumphi explain the
____________
12. G. Guerrini, Accademie e biblioteche d’Italia, 54 n. IV (1986) 12.-33.

12
"why" of the use of the work, a reading of the latter conducted according to suitable methodology also allows us to understand "how" this use was implemented.
These two works of Guerrini have given rise to a considerable change of perspective in the association between the Florentine merchants and the Triumphi, anticipating by decades the observation of their frequent dissemination and the continuation of popular compilations even when the most exclusive manuscripts appeared.

Although it may seem far from immediate, the fact of the appearance of illuminated manuscripts alongside the continuing production of those ordinary manuscripts already present in the first half of the century, appears as a modification of the "editorial" form of the environment of the main readers. The emergence of the Triumphi, recognized as a literary work of the greatest importance deserving to be compiled individually in an exclusive manuscript, happened, however, at a later time, when in Florence there came the extraordinary flowering of those precious manuscripts, which we can discuss again separately.

7. Dissemination of illuminated manuscripts

The importance of the first phase of the spread of the writings of Petrarch in Florence is still a bit uncertain, with some gaps in the information we have today; but that of the second phase, beginning with the Triumphi, is recognized by all, before similar phenomena were repeated in other cities and other countries. To reconstruct how the first copies of the Triumphi passed from hand to hand is very difficult, but it is clear that the illuminated manuscripts had an extraordinary diffusion in the city; there appeared many copies of richly illustrated Triumphi, with very similar illuminations among them, not very faithful to the written text. Now there was no need to involve other works in this: the illuminated Triumphi represented already a complete work, much sought after. Today also the studies on manuscripts of the Triumphi concern especially these richly illustrated works, if only because of course they are the only ones studied by art historians. It was decades before this fashion crosses the Alps, but at

13
least in central and northern Europe in the following centuries the fashion lasted longer; overall the Triumphi can be considered one of the works that have enjoyed the greatest spread throughout Europe, both in literature and pictorial art.

Probably the reason for this popularity in Florence is mostly social. The writings of Petrarch were much appreciated in the courts and it can be said that - unlike Dante - the poet meant to write precisely to, and only to, the highest levels of the society of his time. Thus if in an Italian court a duke commissioned a fine edition of the Triumphi, none of his subjects would have dreamed of imitating him.

The situation was completely different in Florence: first of all, there was no lord of the city yet, and there was a continuous race with no end among families, because none prevailed too much over the others; only subsequent events make us realize that the Medici family was to rule all. After the fears that followed the tumult of the Ciompi in 1378, with the following restoration, it had become necessary for the ruling class to make fully manifest their right to govern the city. To present themselves worthy of their political and social role the higher leading families resurrected traditions fallen into disuse and returned some customs and events current that in the past in Florence, and also at the time in other cities, were used to distinguish the nobility from the people ..

It must be remembered that in Florence the families involved were no longer those of the nobility (kept out of public office according to the Ordinances of Justice) and around the new prominent families there were many more that approached oligarchic status and aspired to be part of it. In this race of emulations and continual imitations also were also the works of art commissions and, in our case, the illuminated manuscripts of the Triumphi. The codex reserved for a few people in other Italian cities, and not yet beyond the Alps, was requested in Florence in dozens of copies. Something similar probably happened for the Florentine fashion, almost simultaneously, of the first triumphs-playing cards, but for that it is more difficult to set the starting date.

For the Triumphi, all authors interested in the phenomenon of the spread of illuminated manuscripts cite a letter by Matteo de’ Pasti to Piero de' Medici (13), which is of great importance. There are no known complete
__________________
13. G. Milanesi, Lettere d’artisti italiani dei secoli XIV e XV. Roma 1869.

14
cycles of miniatures of the Triumphi before that time and from that document it is clear that there was still no standard practice in depicting those images. The question that the illuminator puts to the commissoner is not about the depiction of a small detail, for the buyer’s preference, but a group of important aspects of the scene.

In short, for many illuminated Petrarchian codices in Florence in the fifteenth century (some of which are now today in distant libraries) we not only see a fashion flourish, but in practice also its beginning, dating from shortly after 1440, for us a date very close to the notice we have about a parallel fashion in the triumphs of playing cards; in essence also, too close to be able to conclude that in Florence, the illuminated Triumphi influenced the triumphs [trionfi], as based on the dates that appear it is more likely vice versa, also because it is not known how many could have been in circulation before the new playing cards, of which we lack information on when they started to appear. On the other hand, a similar time-inconsistency has already been found in Florence for the fashion of triumphal motifs in birth trays (14) and wedding chests (15).

8. Amateur Contributions

Commenting on the six triumphs of Petrarch is also not easy at the amateur level. On the one hand it is useless to repeat what everyone knows or can find at once in a thousand publications. On the other hand it is impossible to take account of everything that has already been written; it is difficult to use even one of the fundamental contributions of professionals, as already seen at the beginning.

Allowing me to write something, there is the limited field of our interest, that of studying the Triumphi in view of the triumphs-tarots [trionfi-tarocchi]; There is also the "advantage" of not having to ask that my contribution be accepted in a serious journal, or considered, perhaps, for viewing in a university competition - in fact, I write for amateurs like me. With these drastic limitations, many important discussions become marginal. For a connection with the cards you end up identifying a most important point, of all the others already mentioned: the
______________
14. http://www.naibi.net/A/511-DESCHI-Z.pdf
15. http://www.naibi.net/A/517-CASSONI-Z.pdf

15
progression of a person who triumphs over the previous year. This is the fundamental character that is required for a scale of values necessary for the simple card game, at least as often as - as happened with the triumphs at the beginning - you do not enter the numbers of the series directly on the cards.

If one considers using six playing cards with representations of Petrarch's triumphs, everyone will know which card captures another. If necessary, one may wonder if we would come to the same conclusion with the same pictures without the intervention of Petrarch, and then eventually back to the sources from which the poet was able to derive his own "scale of values". Sometimes in studies of the Triumphi the Psychomachia of Prudentius is mentioned as the distant origin of an entire genre of literary works and paintings, of which one part would be the works of Petrarch; but there it is mainly about virtues overcoming vices, presented as a different kind of triumphs that, although part of a single setting, follow each other independently. At our level, we can be satisfied with Petrarch's poem without being concerned with any of the above, and from there move forward in our direction.

Our fundamental problem is unfortunately one that has not interested the books with more notes than text, namely that of advancing, suddenly or by degrees, from six triumphs up to twenty-two. Instead, among amateur contributions, I know an exceptional whole book that sees the very origin of the tarot just with Petrarch, resident in Avignon. (16). In my opinion, this is an amateur contribution that is coupled with scientific in quotes: this seems to me the maximum in our field; I can only repeat what I have already written (17):
The origin of the tarot would be connected with Pope John XXII (1249-1334), who was too old and tired to continue reading books. So different authors undertook to provide books reduced to pure and simple sequences of images. Unless I have misunderstood the text (and I am ready to recognize my limited understanding) the authors explain the birth of the tarot sequence as only an extension of the six triumphs celebrated by Petrarch; Also, they go to further extend the set of triumphal cards so as to include, subsequently, the cards of the four suits. As a final result, we obtain that the tarot sequence had already been born, although
__________________
16. R. Fusi, R. Pio, Tarocchi un giallo storico: Le carte perdute e ritrovate. Firenze 2001; reprinted in 2004 with the title: Petrarca, Simone Martini e le carte.
17. F. Pratesi, Giochi di carte nella repubblica fiorentina. Ariccia 2016, p. 504.

17
kept in a rather secret form, before the death of Simone Martini (1344), and Petrarch (1374). As for me, I'm always looking to set back the date of the origin of our triumphs, but this is excessive; we can only comment briefly: You are too kind, Saint Anthony!" [Translator’s note: Per Wikipedia, this expression is taken from a story in which a man asks St. Anthony’s help in mounting his horse. The saint helps, but now their joint exertions land him on the ground on the other side, where he utters the expression.]
Perhaps the most daring result of that book is that from the Triumphi would be derived not only the triumphal tarot cards, but the whole pack, including the number and picture cards. It is better to reduce our expectations and limit ourselves to less ambitious considerations.

9. General information on the correspondence between triumphs and the Triumphi

After taking into consideration the opinions of the "serious" scholars, we have arrived at a point where we have had to turn to the contributions, at least apparently less fundamental, of the collectors and amateur historians of playing cards. It should be noted that these contributions are not, as one might expect, a kind of appendix to those published by academics, but come to fill a space that the "scientific" studies have left blank, the correspondence between triumphal tarot cards and the Petrarchan triumphs, which, once accepted, becomes the point of our greatest interest. At the base you have assumed that there really is a match, otherwise Petrarch, despite all his recognized importance as poet laureate and proto-humanist, would serve no purpose for the topic that interests us.

An historical connection between the two groups of subjects (as I was reminded by Ross Caldwell) actually comes from the environment of playing cards, from that of minchiate in the seventeenth century: Paolo Minucci comments on the order of rank among the superior cards of the game and ends with the similitude of our interest.
l Petrarca similmente ne’ Trionfi fa come un giuoco; perché Amore è superato dalla Castità, la Castità dalla Morte, la Morte dalla Fama, e la Fama dalla Divinità, la quale eternamente regna.

(Petrarch similarly made of the Triumphi a game; because Love is overcome by Chastity, Chastity by Death, Death by Fame, and Fame by the Deity, who reigns eternally.)
We mus not give to this quote, and in particular that "similitude", more importance than it has. Everyone knows the Triumphi; everyone knows the minchiate, or at least everyone knew them at the time; Minucci does not look for a deeper partnership between the two parties: speaking of minchiate, he just wants to point to the fact that even in it, as in the Triumphi, there is a ranking: the element that follows is more powerful than the one that precedes it. Everything is here, but this point remains of course very important for us always to keep in mind.

In fact, the two groups of successive subjects are often mentioned together, but without explicit attempts to match them element to element. We can even conclude boldly that there is no match, but here we are interested more in hypotheses that suppose it. Meanwhile we see what we can expect from that comparison. It seems to me that the results can be grouped into a few different types, aside from the problematic task of having them associated with twenty-two objects.

Then the first development that can be imagined is to identify the similarity among the six Petrarchan triumphs and the same number in the cards. For attaining the result, several options are opened for how to consider the sixteen triumphal cards left unmatched. One possibility is to consider them in whole or in part still linked to Petrarch, maybe finding the Triumphi figure matched not with one but two or four of the tarots; another is to investigate a different origin, completely independent of the Triumphi.

It seems unlikely that a pack of cards existed in which the triumphal cards were only six, like the Triumphi. The sequence may have formed gradually, however, such that our task is not to seek a correspondence between the six and twenty-two items, but rather only among a group of six, and, typically, another group of fourteen or sixteen triumphal cards, that is, as many as would hypothetically be present in the first packs, all of them independently of the Triumphi.

10. Particular proposed correspondences

In what follows we consider some proposals on the correspondence between triumphal cards and the Triumphi. These cases were reported to me by experts who, like me, are interested in the subject at

18
an amateur level, including the authors of some of the mentioned proposals.

Associazione Le Tarot

This association is an obligatory point of reference for those interested in the tarot in Italy, and even beyond, thanks to the untiring work of study, dissemination and coordination of various high-level contributors by its founder and president, Andrea Vitali. Here I use the catalog of their international exhibition organized through the patronage of the Ministry for Cultural and Environmental Heritage (19).

In the catalog, in part reproduced also in the association's web pages (20), we can read that the Triumphi were at the origin of the tarot; this statement does not come very unexpectedly, its originality is found, other than in the Prince, in the reconstruction of the triumphal cards guided by numerology, ending in the fateful 22.

In what follows we consider some proposals on the correspondence between triumphal cards and the Triumphi. These cases were reported to me by experts who, like me, are interested in the subject at an amateur level, including the authors of some of the proposals mentioned.
This game derives from the Triumphi of Francesco Petrarch, in which the fourteenth-century poet describes the six major forces that govern men and assigned to each a hierarchical value. The Romanesque numerology saw in the number Six the "superhuman power" because it corresponded to the days of biblical creation. .... The number of triumph cards, the conception of which is due to Prince Francesco Antelminelli Castracani Fibbia, seems to have been originally composed of 8 allegories, later 14 and 16, to settle finally on 22, a number that in its Christian mystical meaning is the introduction of the wisdom and divine teachings engraved in humanity. This path, which declares in a progressive adaptation of these numerological "playing cards" dictates of a religious nature, was likely to have been adopted to avoid the condemnation by the Church that had repeatedly been hurled against card games that were considered gambling.
Missing here an explicit one-to-one correspondence between the Triumphi and the cards, but we will find this in other studies.

Michael S. Howard

In the case of this author it would be questionable whether I include him among us amateurs, considering his professional studies in areas not too far from this one. According to him, the Triumphi were fundamental constituents
_____________
19. A. Vitali (ed.), La carovana dei tarocchi. Turin, s.d. [In Italian at http://www.associazioneletarot.it/cgi-b ... aliano.pdf, in English at http://www.associazioneletarot.it/cgi-b ... rovan.pdf; in French at http://www.associazioneletarot.it/cgi-b ... r_sito.pdf].
20. http://www.associazioneletarot.it/page. ... 11&lng=ITA [in English at http://www.associazioneletarot.it/page. ... 11&lng=ENG].

19
of the first triumphs, and they formed a larger part than usual, as the first triumphs would be 16, made precisely from all six of Petrarch, in addition to the seven virtues and the two cards of the Emperor and Empress. At this point you get 15 of the 16 triumphal cards hypothetically present originally. It is therefore only remains to seek the sixteenth card, which according to Howard would be the Wheel, which is one of two surviving triumphal cards in the Brera-Brambilla deck made by the same workshop and is one of the most obvious allegories of the Amorosa Visione. This interpretation has been used by Howard to propose a possible reconstruction of the Cary-Yale deck, inclusive of the cards that have been lost (21).

Lothar Teikemeier

He is probably the most prolific animator of discussion on the triumphs that can be met on the Internet, as much on his website Trionfi.com, as in the Tarot History Forum; there is no sector in the history of tarot where he has not opened a new discussion exploring, forgotten contributions, always on the web, that no one would be able to fish out in a comparable amount from old texts, German or otherwise.

Also in this case he has a theory to propose, where there are mostly clear associations between tarot cards and the Triumphi, reported in the following table (22). Where the association is not there – the cards in the table printed in italics – it means that those cards were added independently of the Triumphi. The correspondence is almost one to one, but there are a couple of exceptions, which concern Time. It would be quite unusual to associate it with the Hermit, but here that association is so present, but secondarily and with a question mark; the reason is that time is preferably associated with four of the tarot cards, three as measures of time - year, month, day respectively for Star, Moon and Sun - while Judgment again has to do with Time, as it is its end.
_________________
21. http://www.naibi.net/A/502-CARYYA-Z.pdf
22. L. Teikemeier, email 06.10.2016.

22
Image
* Indicating here, understandably, a correspondence added with a question mark to 5, “Time”.
**Association justified in the case of Temperance depicted with wings.

Gertrude Moakley

To include Moakley among the amateurs seems indeed a bit reductive. Her profession would have been that of archivist; distinguishing whether her involvement with the tarot was amateur or professional seems to me a matter of splitting hairs, especially for her book, a pioneering contribution discussed in all monographs on the subject (23). The book is of interest even today, after half a century, but here we have to go back a decade, to her article centered on our topic, of which I did not know and was informed of it by Ross Caldwell (24).

I report it in the form of the proposed table, with minimal changes, such as including the Fool at the beginning, rather than the end, the only card for which a match is not given, since it is outside the series; for all the other cards - receiving help from minchiate - there is a correspondence with the Triumphi, naturally with appropriate groupings.
__________________
23. G. Moakley, The tarot cards painted by Bonifacio Bembo. New York 1966.
24. G. Moakley, Bulletin of The New York Public Library. Vol. 60 No. 2 (1956) 55-69.

21
Moakley reports a couple of features that make her proposal appear particularly valuable; one is that even within groups corresponding to only one triumph of Petrarch (the card at five) one can identify a ranking in accordance with the position in the group. The circumstance appears even more significant, emphasized by her, that the modern order of the cards did not need a significant reshuffling, having only to put out of order the cards ranking number 9 and number 14.

Image
* [Matto] Not part of the procession

As weak points of this proposal, which is rather stimulating, we can mention the lack of an appropriate association with Fame (although it might hint at an astonishing antiquity to minchiate and become a plus) and also the fact that Moakley in the book cited, printed a decade later, argues that a correspondence like this would be just a kind of irreverent

22
parody of the carnival type, with almost burlesque transformations of the personages involved.

11. Conclusion

A number of studies of Petrarch's Triumphi have been examined, focusing especially on the few that have proven useful for our point of view, aimed at the interest of the subject in the history of playing cards. In some images found in the tarot, there appear obvious similarities with those of the Triumphi; to better compare the two groups we cannot use the text left unfinished at the death of the poet in 1374, but that accompanied by the fine illuminations which became, particularly in Florence in the mid-fifteenth century, a highly sought-after book, just when also the triumphs-cards had, in Florence, their first diffusion.

As seen in Florence for the fashion of triumphal motifs in birth trays and wedding chests, it is likewise for that of the illuminated manuscripts of the Triumphi, it would seem that they all exclude a direct influence on the origin of the triumph-like playing cards, because of the latter we have notice in 1440 and probably were already known some years before, when the Florentine fashion for the other objects of the minor arts decorated with triumphal motifs was not yet widespread. This applies to the associated picture cycle, but not to the text of the Triumphi which also previously had an appreciable movement in Florence.

Franco Pratesi - 15/10/2016


Comments on "Triumphs and Trionfi"
(by Michael S. Howard)

The bulk of my comments on this note are incorporated in another set of comments, those to Franco's "Earliest Triumphs". Here I want to focus on only the last part of Franco's "Triumphs and Trionfi", namely the specific correspondences that have been proposed between triumphs and Triumphi.

To begin with, I want to clarify something about the proposal credited to me in Franco's note above. First, the application to the Cary-Yale is not due to me, but to Lothar Teikemier, in his "chess analogy", expounded in various places. However he does not necessarily support the Wheel and the Old Man as what corresponds to the bishops in chess. I support this association because the Wheel and the Old Man have in common, in the Brera-Brimbilla (for the Wheel) and the PMB (for both)an old man, thus forming a pair, and bishops were conventionally thought of as men of advanced maturity, even if in practice political appointees were sometimes given this position as children. The other pairs are the Angel and the World, (both with castles, like the rook in chess), the Chariot and Death (both with horses, like the Knight in chess); and the Emperor and Empress (both with crowns, like the King and Queen).

Second, it is not for me quite a hypothesis for the original tarot, but just for the connection between the deck of Marziano and the Cary-Yale, which might also explain some of the origin of minchiate. It is not part of the hypothesis to exclude earlier versions of the tarot, perhaps in other cities, which the Cary-Yale would have built on in light of Marziano.

Franco had emailed me the precise wording of his summary of my proposal, but I somehow missed seeing that it was presented as a hypothesis about the origin of the tarot. My apologies to Franco and to the reader. It is,however, very definitely a proposal about the relationship of the tarot to Petrarch's poem at a particular phase of the tarot's development. It does not exclude the proposals presented for Lothar ("Huck") and Moakley for later periods and particular decks.

As Dummett admirably said at the beginning of both Game of Tarot and Il Mondo e l'Angelo[/i], there is no such thing as "the tarot pack". I will quote the latter source, more succinct than the previous; it is the first two sentences of Chapter One:
Nelle note alla Terra desolata T. S. Eliot scrisse: «non conosco la costituzione esatta del mazzo dei tarocchi». Non esiste, in realtà, nulla del genere; esistono più forme distinte del mazzo dì tarocchi, ciascuna diversa dall’altra per composizione.

(In the notes to The Waste Land T. S. Eliot wrote: "I am not familiar with the exact constitution of the Tarot pack". There exists, in fact, nothing of the kind; there exist numerous distinct forms of the tarot pack, each different in composition.)
So when discussing correspondences, it all depends on what deck, in terms of composition and order, we have in mind. Mine was to apply to the CY only.

Moakley's proposal

Moakley's suggestion, that each Petrarchan triumph corresponded not to one card but to a group, in order but excluding Fame from the list, except in minchiate (presented by Franco at viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1092&start=20#p17714). The Triumph of Love would include all the cards up to Love. Then Chastity would apply to the second group, up to the Hanged Man. Death would apply to the next five, Time to the Hermit, and Eternity to the last five, as in the following chart  Image 
To include all these various cards, the concept of "love" must be somewhat broader than it is in Petrarch, to include love of God (Pope, Popess), love of family and the social hierarchy(emperor, empress), perhaps love of the bizarre or, if the Bateleur is offering the shell game, riches. In that way he triumphs over the Fool, if that card was originally number 1. Either or both (or a hybrid) can triumph over--i.e. get the better of--Kings, and so, while being the lowest of their suit, higher than any of the regular suit cards.

For Chastity, the idea of including a variety of virtues gets some support in the poem itself, where Chastity is not alone but has other virtues with her ((http://petrarch.petersadlon.com/read_tr ... ge=II-I.en). Justice is not one of them, nor Temperance or Fortitude. In Petrarch, they are specifically the virtues that have a particular relation to sexual morality: modesty, shame, fear of infamy. But Temperance, i.e. self-control, is also related to Chastity, and so is Fortitude, although these apply to many areas of life. To include them in their broader applications, not to mention Justice, we have to go beyond sex, to Virtue. We need not be faithful to Petrarch; but the deck is getting further from the poems.

Moakley suggested that the celestials belong with Eternity, whereas Huck put them with Time. Well, in Petrarch, the Star is in both Fame (as an "amorous star", an object of love by those that desire her) and Eternity. And Time is the whirling of the heavens, with the Sun his main image. Eternity is the end of all that Yet it creates everything (including Fame, Chastity, and Love, I think) in a new form ((http://petrarch.petersadlon.com/read_tr ... ge=VI-I.en):
...If all things
That are beneath the heavens are to fail,
How, after many circlings, will they end?

So ran my thought; and as I pondered it
More and more deeply, I at last beheld
A world made new and changeless and eternaL
I saw the sun, the heavens, and the stars
And land and sea unmade, and made again
More beauteous and more joyous than before.
...
Past, present, future: these I saw combined
In a single term, and that unchangeable:
No swiftness now, as there had been before.
...
The sun no more will pause in the Bull or the Fish,...
So apparently the celestials exist in a new form after the end of time, without whirling. But in that case, as I have said earlier in this thread, they lose their special relationship to the triumph in which they appear. So I think Moakley is wrong, at least in the sense of not fitting the poem. The celestials belong to Petrarchan Time. On the other hand, Petrarchan Time can be modified to fit the celestials: in the ancient pagan world it was thought that the celestials were "eternal, but in time". It is a non-biblical concept of Time. Then we avoid the awkward predicament of having three cards representing Time in one place, and 1 card representing Time in another.

In medieval symbolism, the celestials did sometimes represent time. If so, the Old Man's hourglass is either a relic of times gone by, when it did represent Petrarchan Time, or it never did represent the whirlings after death, but only those before death. Either way, his position before Death is a modification of Petrarch. But if we can modify Love and Chastity, why not also Time?

We are left with Fame and Eternity. In minchiate, there is a Fama card, the card ordinarily then called Angel and later Judgment. In Petrarch, Judgment is associated only with the triumph of Eternity:
No secret shall be covered or be hid,
And every conscience, be it clear or dark,
Will then be open before all the world.
There will be One whose judgment will be sure,
And we shall see each sinner go his way
Like a driven beast seeking a forest cave.
Since Eternity is also the last Petrarchan triumph, it makes sense that the Angel of Judgment should be associated with Eternity. However the Angel is also associated with Fama, in the sense of "eternal glory" and also by the trumpet. Either is plausible.

Then there is the question of what to do with the card called the World. Is it part of the "Eternity" group? If so, then it represents the transcendence of the World, in the sense of the material world. Maybe a figure standing on a circle representing the world can count as such, especially if it is part of group and so doesn't have to be last, as in the A order. In the B order, it could represent Eternity easily, since it is after the Angel of Judgment and God's Justice.

But in the A order cards it also has attributes of Fame: the Boccaccian globe and sword, and the circle containing the world. If so, the figure on top of the world would be "on top of the world", in the sense of being master of it. There is also the question of the PMB World card: is it the Fame of Sforza's remodeled city, or the New Jerusalem, which looks rather like Sforza's program?

Yet some, historically, seem to have felt uncomfortable about its being Fame, especially when in the B and C orders, where it is at the end of the sequence and has no particular attributes of Fame. So Alciati calls the 14th card Fama and has no Temperance card. And Vieville gives the lady pouring from one vessel to another with the words "FAMA SOL".

I also wonder whether the Star card might be considered Fame. Another candidate might be the Tower card; the tower of Babel, according to the vulgate, was built to "make our name famous:
venite faciamus nobis civitatem et turrem cuius culmen pertingat ad caelum et celebremus nomen nostrum...

(...let us make a city and a tower, the top whereof may reach to heaven; and let us make our name famous.)
The card would be a moral lesson about the evil of working for earthly fame.

To sum up: Moakley's idea has the virtue of including all the cards. However to fit any existing order, Petrarchan concepts, including their order, have to be adjusted considerably. And even then it is not clear which cards go where, or if one or more triumph simply doesn't fit.

This is not to say that something like Moakley's thinking didn't affect the order and make-up of the 22 triumphs. For Love, the generalized idea does fit. For Chastity, the B order fits best, since Fortitude and Temperance are not hard to relate to Chastity, whereas Justice fits more easily with Eternity and the Last Judgment. If the concept of Chastity is further generalized to include Virtue generally, then the A order fits best.

However this result must be qualified: even Milan has a good claim to fit Petrarch, however not in the 16th century C order but earlier, because in the Cary-Yale all but one of the Petrarchans are represented, and that one, Time, is represented in the PMB. In that case, however, the Petrarchans apply not to groups but only to those specific cards, and whether they fit the Petrarchan order is not clear. For the 5 that have survived, following the order suggested by the Beinecke suit-assignments, they in fact do, as can be seen by the titles in all capital letters in the following chart (which Franco made for his essay "Ruminations on the Cary-Yale".
Image
From this perspective, that Temperance follows Death is not a change from a preexisting order where it preceded Death (as in A and B), but rather a property of an even earlier order in Milan.
This perspective is not tied to Milan or even a 16 card tarot sequence. As Franco speculated in his note just mentioned, the cards above, when rearranged, correspond to what could have been an early, 16 card version of Florentine minchiate, which later had all the cards listed above. Furthermore, it can easily be adjusted to a 14 card tarot sequence, for decks in which it might have been thought desirable to have the same number of cards in the special suit as in the other four, i.e. 14. All that has to be done is to suppose that Time is represented by the Wheel rather than by the Old Man, who is therefore not needed in this deck, and that Prudence is either removed or conflated with one of the other cards. In Florence, the card called the World has attributes also associated with Fame in early representations of the Triumph of Fame, namely, being on a chariot and holding a sword and globe. Yet the allegorical figure, as seen in the Charles VI tarot of Florence,  also has an octagonal halo, which is otherwise only seen with the virtue cards. An identification with the World card is also suggested by Prudence's characterization as "knowing one's highest good". The highest good, according to Aristotle, was happiness, but according to the Church it was God, and for the soul, being with God in Eternity. Here it must be recalled that the Sermones de Ludo had characterized the World as "God the Father".  The Angel card, too, reminds of our highest good, namely, to be accepted by a merciful God in heaven. So it is another possibility, a conflation of Eternity and Prudence. Alternatively, it could simply be dropped, as it is in fact is dropped, at least in name, in the 22 card sequence that will be standard.