Wednesday, June 12, 2024

April-June 2019: Pocket atlas and minchiate from 1780

Below is my translation (with Franco's help) of "Atlante tascabile e minchiate del 1780," at https://www.naibi.net/A/83-atlante-02.pdf, originally published in The Playing-Card Vol. 47, No. 4 (April-June 2019), pp. 230-240. As usual, comments in square brackets are mine, after consulting with Franco, for clarification purposes. Numbers by themselves in the left margin are the journal page numbers, and the footnotes are at the bottom of these pages. Before the essay there is a brief English summary.


Pocket atlas and minchiate from 1780


Franco Pratesi

English Summary

Pocket Atlas and Minchiate from 1780. This study was first carried out in the Biblioteca Riccardiana of Florence, beginning with a detailed inventory of its books, compiled in 1810; a title there read Gioco delle minchiate geografico, clearly that was a nice incentive for research. Aniello Lamberti engraved the figures and was the most active person in advertising the publication enterprise; his partners Giovanni de Baillou and Agostino da Rabatta were renowned experts of geography and science in Florence at the time.
A search in the OPAC indicated that a second copy was present in the Faenza library. The study has been continued with current web tools and several further items and descriptions were found, coming more from specialists of geography than from playing-card experts. All the copies found in public and private libraries have been reviewed, including one case of evident use as playing cards.
The conclusion is that this extraordinary object - with very few surviving copies - was used both as a pack of playing cards and as engravings to be hung on walls, in addition to its main use as an updated pocket atlas of the world, which included countries such as New Zealand that had just been discovered at the time of its publication.


Introduction

Among the numerous customs that affected playing cards there was also that of decorating them with geographical maps. Entire books have been written on this particular type of cards, understandably quite rare, which has nevertheless found space among collectors, always in search of out-of-the-ordinary motifs. Sylvia Mann also had a pioneering role in this sector, [note 1] although her greatest merit was that of having made ordinary decks of cards appreciated as a priority, even by collectors themselves (or at least of having tried).

At the origin of this study is an inventory of the works present in 1810 in the Riccardiana Library in Florence. This catalog was officially compiled on the occasion of the sale of the entire collection and should therefore be considered completely reliable; it has recently been reproduced in digital form on the web pages of the Library. [note 2]. Among the works listed we can note: “2341 Baillou, and Rabatta, gioco delle minchiate geografico [geographic game of minchiate]. Florence 1779 in l6°.” The particular deck of cards in question looks like a pocket atlas. Already in the long title
____________________
1. S. Mann, D. Kingsley, Playing cards, depicting maps of British Isles, and of English and Welsh counties. London 1972.
2. www.riccardiana.firenze.sbn.it/BRFI_INV ... A_1810.pdf [not currently found, but now see https://www.google.it/books/edition/Inv ... frontcover]

231
its usefulness for the study of geography and ancient and modern history [note 3] is indicated. The reduced dimensions of the pages have been utilized to offer the work another possibility: to be used as a deck of playing cards, not an ordinary one, but a Florentine minchiate, with all its 97 cards; it is a well-known fact that at that time, minchiate enjoyed widespread popularity in Florence.

The atlas is known to historians of cartography such as Vladimiro Valerio, who described it in his extensive review of works of the genre. [note 4] A peculiarity of this tiny atlas is that the suit-signs of the playing cards are also indicated on the geographical maps, and it was printed only on the fronts of the pages, so that each page can serve precisely as the figure of a playing card, also having comparable dimensions.

Special features of the atlas
Format

In the "Prospectus of the Work," printed in three pages at the beginning of the book, at least in the Riccardiana copy, the particular character of this Atlas is also underlined.

Once the first V [five] Cards [carte, also = Sheets] have been removed, each of the others is divided into two parts: in the upper part the Card [carta] of a given Province is outlined, and in the lower part a small Table where the general division can be seen at a glance, and details of that Province, its Relevance, and the Quality of Government: Arabic numbers repeated in the Geographical Card [carta] precede each district to identify the situation; as well as that of the respective Capitals, which are followed by the names of the ancient Peoples corresponding inhabitants of those Districts and Cities; then by means of some Asterisks explained in a separate small Table affixed to each City its former qualities are known, e.g. whether it is a Bishopric, a Presidium, in the Plain, in the Mountains, on the bank of a River, etc.
__________________
3. G. di Baillou, A. da Rabatta, Nuovo atlante generale metodico ed elementare tascabile per lo studio della geografia ed istoria antica, e moderna arricchito di varie carte delle nuove scoperte. Florence 1779.
4. See Valerio, L'Universo, Vol. 70 N. 3 (1990), 298-353.

232
The geographical maps [carte - the same word in Italian used for both cards and maps] appear as hand-colored engravings in pale tones of pink, yellow, and a few other colors. The new pocket atlas does not limit itself to presenting geographical maps [carte]: these usually only occupy half of the page, typically the top half. The maps in atlases of similar dimensions are usually printed full page, or on two facing pages; therefore, these maps, finely engraved, can be considered among the smallest printed, if not the smallest ever.

Image

Halfway down the page will be found the symbols that indicate which playing card [carta da gioco] it is; at the bottom there are lists of the main places, with the types of government and information on the administrative subdivisions. In effect, this is detailed information that was not normally reported in atlases, even larger ones. The indicated schema is not always strictly respected: some pages show two geographical maps without annotations; even the division of the page between map and notes is not repeated in a rigorous manner and one of the two parts can be much larger than the other.

Layout
In Valerio’s article already cited, it was noted that the copy preserved in Rome was printed double-sided, while a second copy preserved in a private collection had the geographical maps only on the front of the page; only in the second case would it have been possible to use the pages of the atlas as playing cards. That peculiarity now appears more common: all the other specimens traced are printed only on one side of the sheet; normally, therefore, when you open a book you will find a blank page on the left and one with a map on the right; or pairs of facing maps appear, with pairs of blank pages between them.

Correspondence of geographical maps and playing cards [carte geografiche e da gioco]

The following table lists all the cards in the deck of minchiate, in the order in which they appear in the Riccardiana’s book; for each card (in the suits of BAtons, SWords, CUps and COins) the corresponding geographical card is indicated [and similarly Ki for King, Qu for Queen, Kn for Knight, and Pa for Page; the original has BAStoni, SPAde, COPpe, DENari, then Re, Do, Ca, and Fa, for Re, Donna, Cavaliere, and Fante]. Image
233 Image

Descriptions by cartographic historians

Mann and Kingsley's 1972 publication is clearly of interest both in the cartographic field and for the history of playing cards. It is precisely in the second sector that Sylvia Mann played an important pioneering role. As has

234
occurred among historians of playing cards, also in the cartographic and geographical fields in general, the fame of this particular atlas has remained rather limited. It was examined for the first time by Valerio in 1988 [note 5] and in 1990 in the important review already mentioned; little progress has been made since then. The atlas is briefly described in specialist reviews of the late twentieth century such as King's Miniature antique maps and Tooley's Dictionary of Mapmakers; van der Heijden also takes it into account in Oude kaarten der Nederlanden, for the United Provinces and the Low Countries, but only indicates the presence of examples in Chicago, Leinfelden and Rome.
Image
Book as atlas

That the book is actually an atlas is certain; equally certain is that as an atlas it is not among the common specimens. The term "Atlantic” sheet is used in stationery to indicate the largest format available for a sheet of paper, which today would be referred to as A2; this makes it even more evident that this atlas is very out of the ordinary. However, it is not the first object of this kind; Valerio's study specifically indicates a previous rather similar edition, published in Paris in 1762. The experts' comment is that these objects met the fashion of the time for tiny and valuable objects.

Book as minchiate

We can understand the trend of fashion towards unusual books and atlases like these, but what does minchiate have to do with it? At the same time, only in Florence (or at least more than any other place) could one think of that strange combination of minchiate and atlas. For a historian of playing cards, the problem arises of understanding whether the obvious analogy with a deck of minchiate was introduced to use these pages also as playing cards, or whether it was just a kind of additional decoration on the atlas. One might think that our atlas was nothing more than the result of a ploy to have a pack of minchiate at one's disposal while evading any control over manufacturing and marketing, and avoiding any stamp duty; in short,
__________
5. See Valerio, The Map Collector, 45 (1988), 10-18.

235
a deck of playing cards with additional content that is only apparently educational in nature.

However, there are several clues to make us think that it is a book conceived above all as a geographical atlas, albeit of an unusual format. If geographical maps [carte] had been nothing more than an additional function compared to their main use as playing cards, there would have been no need to compose them with such care, both in the fineness of the engravings and in the updating of the descriptions, up to and including areas discovered in recent months. It is also true that the typical symbols of playing cards are present on each of these cards, but in a way that is too inconspicuous for comfortable use by players, accustomed to "reading" very different figures, drawn across the board and painted in bright colors.

Authors and their contributions

To better understand the situation, it is useful to know something more about the people interested in the project: Baron Giovanni de Baillou, friar Agostino da Rabatta, and the engraver Aniello Lamberti.

Giovanni de Baillou. Essential biographical data can be found in the Dizionario biografico degli Italiani [Biographical Dictionary of Italians]. Of a noble family originally from Flanders, he was born in Livorno in 1758 and died in Florence in 1819. In the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, he received high-level official positions. Among his main interests was the theatre, but he also distinguished himself in other fields for his vast linguistic knowledge, his studies of law and, in particular, he was professionally active and appreciated as a geographer.

Agostino da Rabatta. To better define the activity of this friar, it is necessary to insert ourselves into the context of the scientific studies of the time, which saw notable progress in Florence, also in connection with the most recent Parisian developments. Several of his handwritten works are preserved in the Conventi soppressi [Suppressed Convents] collection of the National Central Library of Florence; mostly they are didactic texts on theological and philosophical topics. However, the sector in which he stood out the most was aerostatics. After previous local experiments, when news of Montgolfier's successes arrived from France, Agostino da Rabatta with a couple of confraternity brothers created prototypes of aerostats which, in a couple of very successful demonstrations, aroused the interest of the whole city.

Aniello Lamberti. Of the three people involved, Lamberti's role is the most specific: in the pocket atlas initiative he played the role of engraver, which coincided with his profession. There are no other works of his in the field of playing cards, nor of atlases; however, as an engraver, Lamberti

236
had notable fame and was able to work for not only the Florentine but also the Neapolitan courts. His engravings commissioned to illustrate the Boboli Gardens and later the royal palace of Naples and the excavations of Pompeii met with considerable success. His activity was also appreciated in scientific publications which he illustrated in an original way.

Authors' contributions. 
The examination of the description introduced in the Atlas and above all of the "Notice to the Public" [Avisso al Pubblico, below] (originally printed front and back on a loose sheet, measuring 12x16 cm and preserved at the end of the copy in the Riccardiana Library) allows us to understand something more about the different role of the authors of the atlas. A full transcript can be found in a preliminary version of this study. [note 6]
Image 
The "Notice to the Public” as a presentation to be distributed among potentially interested people clarifies several issues for us. An important one concerns the date: 1779 was evidently not the year in which the atlas-book was printed, but only its title page; the sheets were printed in small groups in the following months, and in April 1780 the work had reached the halfway point of its edition. Probably in several cases, the cutting and binding were carried out later by the buyers: this may explain the fact that the preserved books have rather careful bindings, but different from each other. Lamberti's role as the main protagonist of the entrepreneurial initiative is confirmed, even if de Baillou and Agostino da Rabatta are indicated as his companions, evidently also taking part in the initiative as partners. We know, on the other hand, that these two "secondary" partners were the authors of the text.

Also of some interest is the fact that thanks to the "Notice to the Public" we are informed about the very manner in which the work was created, using plates, each with four engraved cards.
______________
6. http://trionfi.com/minchiate-atalante-1779

237
Specimens traced

The small format of the edition and the print run itself, originally limited and split at different times, make it unlikely that preserved copies will be found. In addition to the large public libraries of Florence, one can search in the private libraries of two types of collectors, corresponding to the two characteristics of the book: geography enthusiasts and playing card collectors. There are, and have been, copies on sale on the book market, as we will see. A brief description of the copies found will clarify the situation.

Riccardiana Library, Florence. In the public libraries of Florence, which are also very rich in ancient collections, no other specimen is found other than that of the Riccardiana, BRF 2341. The fact of finding it already listed in the 1810 Inventorio constitutes proof of its early inclusion in this Florentine collection. The dimensions of the pages (11x7 cm) are slightly larger than those of the cards glued on top (10.7x6.5 cm). All figures are inserted in a rectangular frame of 9.5x5.3 cm. This atlas-book is more complete than usual, thanks also to the interesting "Notice to the Public," inserted at the end and bound together with the cards. The binding is in cardboard covered with marbled paper [as decoration]. At the top of the back there is a label glued with the title Nuovo Atlante [New Atlas] written in pen.

Manfrediana Library, Faenza. Using OPAC, an example can be found in the Manfrediana Municipal Library of Faenza with location R 2-1-16. We have confirmation from the library of the layout: when opening the book, we encounter alternatively either two pages with geographical maps [carte] or two blank pages; evidently, rather than the printing method, the binding method has changed here. Other information was added by the librarian Fabiano Zambelli. The booklet is part of the Gioacchino Regoli Donation. With the exception of Regoli's ex-libris there are no other ownership notes; the binding is in leather with small gold friezes on the plates and on the back; at the top there is a leather scroll with the imprint: Novvea atlas; the covers are marbled.

Library of the Italian Geographical Society, Rome
. From Valerio's article there is information of a specimen in Rome at the Italian Geographical Society. [note 7] This is the specimen that was reported first in the world of cartographers. Some additional information was also obtained from the librarian of the Italian Geographical Society, Marina Scionti: The small volume is printed on both sides of the sheets; the cover is made of cardboard. There is a dedication in pen: gift from correspondent Member. Prof. E Teza (?) October 1905. Its main characteristic, which distinguishes it from the others we know of, is therefore that all the pages have figures on both the front and the back; which obviously involves both a reduction in thickness and the impossibility of using these pages as playing cards.
__________________
7. www.societageografica.it/index.php?opti ... &Itemid=13 [at this posting a dubious link]

238
Spielkartenmuseum Collection, Leinfelden-Echterdingen. This atlas was used in the aforementioned book by Sylvia Mann and David Kingsley, who had an example available in the Mann collection and were therefore able to reproduce a couple of cards (IX and X of cups). That specimen has become better known to playing card enthusiasts thanks to the interest of the Spielkarten-Museum in Leinfelden-Echterdingen (Inv. Nr. 1991 - 25, acquired in 1991) and in particular of the expert Detlef Hoffmann, who gave information in his books. [note 8] It turns out that the cards of this atlas are made up of several layers, while what usually appears as the intermediate white sheet within the printed cards has here a motif of black crosses on a light background. From the Museum, Annette Köger communicated the data reported and the information that this example is missing the frontispiece.

Newberry Library, Chicago. An example is preserved in Chicago in the Newberry Library with the signature VAULT Ayer G1015.R33 1779. Some particularities of this copy are indicated in the two different catalogs of the library. [Note 9] Other information was communicated by Jim Akerman, curator of the relevant section of the library, in particular, that this specimen was missing three initial cards, for which photocopies taken from the book of the Italian Geographical Society were inserted.

A - Crini Collection, Florence. A private communication from Valerio reported the presence of a specimen in the rich library of Pietro Crini, a Florentine collector of atlases and geographical maps. It was the only one Valerio had information of, in addition to the one he had been able to consult in Rome at the Italian Geographical Society. The specimen entered the collection around 1980, following purchase on the book market. The binding is of excellent quality, all in dark leather decorated in gold and embossed on the spine at the top: Nuovo Atlante [New Atlas], and at the bottom: 1779. On the first page the surname Romiti has been written, evidently one of the previous owners, of which, however, no traces have been preserved. Also in this case, we observe the alternation of printed and blank pages, as in the Faenza example.

Pagliani Collection, Milan
. This specimen was described in a book dedicated to the rich collection of small atlases collected by Paolo Pagliani in Milan; [note 10] Unfortunately, we also read that this rare piece was stolen in May 1998, along with others from the collection. From the description it is clear that the curator did not know the minchiate: "The numbering of the geographical cards is curious, using instead of numbers, zodiac signs, allegories of capital sins and theological virtues, sticks, swords, cups and coins on the Neapolitan cards." The relative presentation also required little effort: “Nothing is known about the A. [Author] except that he was active in Florence in the second
_____________________
8. D. Hoffmann, Tarot - Tarock - Tarocchi. Leinfelden 1988; same author, Kultur und Kunstgeschichte der Spielkarte. Marburg 1995.
9. Newberry Library. Dict. cat. of the E. E. Ayer Coll., Vol. 2, p. 510.
10. M. Bonomelli, Atlas minor: atlanti tascabili dal 16. al 18. Milan 2001.

239
half of the 18th century. Similar consideration must be made regarding this work, which is not reported in the inventories." On this atlas, an autograph dedication was present, also dated in Florence, but in 1882, and at the beginning, the ownership stamp of the Antonio Limoncelli Library.

Mario Cuciniello Collection, Rome.
After many copies of the Atlas, seen especially in the geographical context, news has finally appeared of one that looks just like a deck of minchiate, contained in its own box, as typically happens with many decks of playing cards, albeit in this case uncommon. It is an object owned by a Roman family who has kept it for more than a century. In the first half of the twentieth century, it was part of the Mario Cuciniello Collection in Rome, where that lawyer of Neapolitan origins, collector and bibliophile lived. This precious specimen, probably the only one of its kind preserved, was still in the possession of the same Roman family at the end of 2018, namely by Enrica Schettini Piazza, who had received it as a gift from her lawyer grandfather as a child. Of all the specimens carefully examined or just glimpsed (like this one), it is undoubtedly the most interesting for the history of playing cards; we are in the presence of a deck of cards uniformly cut into the dimensions of 10x6 cm. As can be seen in the figure, here the recreational use is evident, even if it can reasonably be assumed to be very sporadic. A further advantage of this object is that together with the cards there is a copy of the useful Notice to the Public, which until now had only been identified in the copy of the Riccardiana Library, preserved here in a previous version, printed in italics.

B - Crini Collection, Florence. This example is different from all the others, as the work was not bound as a book, but left in the form of loose sheets. How many sheets? Not the hundred of the various editions but the twenty-four original sheets, obtained directly without cuts from the copper plates on each of which four cards had been engraved. The missing cards here are those that constitute the title page in the book and another couple of initial cards, in addition to the figure of the Fool, which turns out to have been printed separately. The addition of these last cards must not have occurred in a homogeneous manner, so much so that in the preserved books they are partly absent, partly inserted without a fixed position, at the beginning or at the end.

In this copy, the coloring is faded or absent; however, this is the only

240
example, which allows us to glimpse the third possible application indicated by the engraver: small pictures to hang in studies "to decorate Studies."

Cards sold separately. Unfortunately, from a commercial point of view, the custom of selling the cards individually is preferred, which can favor the seller's profit. Selling individual geographical cards can appeal to local history enthusiasts, who will be interested in purchasing, even at very high prices, a geographical card of their region, so old as to represent an important historical relic. It is easy to imagine several sales of this type, even if detailed information and prices are only available on the internet for a few. We can thus overlook, for example, a card of Ireland, on sale online, or an isolated card with Corsica and Sardinia present in an auction catalog, but it seems appropriate to point out at least one catalog from 2013 which of these loose cards put up for auction as many as twenty-eight [note 11] and a seller who, still in 2018, offers as many as thirty-three. [note 12]

Conclusions

The book described here is both an unusual pocket-sized atlas and an equally unusual pack of minchiate. Information was collected on the existing examples and on the promoters of the initiative that led to the printing. In reality, each engraving was originally made on a copper plate on which four cards or pages were drawn. The same sheets could be used as decorative prints to frame and hang on the walls of the studies, or be cut to obtain individual cards, intended as geographical or for the game; in the first case, these loose sheets were usually bound as atlas-books; in the second they were preserved in special boxes. While this work has great interest in the history of cartography (if only for the timely inclusion of newly discovered regions, such as New Zealand), the interest for the history of playing cards is limited, if not as evidence of a decidedly extraordinary pack of minchiate. To conclude in this way, however, we must have absorbed Sylvia Mann's great lesson, that is, it is the ordinary decks of playing cards, the ones least sought after by collectors, that provide us with the most historically important information; otherwise, for any collector looking for rare pieces, it would be difficult to point out more desirable examples than these.
________________
11. https://www.gonnelli.it/uploads/auctions/catalogo12.pdf
12. https://alteagallery.com/
Image

Jan.-March 2019: Comments on the Regole delle Minchiatta

 Here is the second in a series of articles published in The Playing Card, 2018-2023, on various extant 18th-19th-century booklets on how to play minchiate. Like the others in the series, it is out of order on this blog - in the middle of Franco's 2024 notes first published on naibi.net - because I didn't notice them earlier, or rather, had seen them in the journal but then forgotten about them when I returned to translating Franco in late 2023.

This one on a lazy Italian translation of a booklet in German by someone who didn't fully understand Italian or, consequently, the game. The original, preceded by an English summary, is "Commenti sul Regole delle Minchiatta," which can be viewed at https://www.naibi.net/A/81.pdf. Comments in square brackets are my explanations, in consultation with Franco, of points that may not have come across very well in the translation. The essay originally appeared in The Playing-Card 47, No. 3 (Jan-March 2019), pp. 176-179). In the translation below, the numbers by themselves in the left margin are the original page numbers in that journal. The footnotes, highlighted in red, are at the bottom of these pages.

Comments on the Regole delle Minchiatta


Franco Pratesi


English Summary. A well-known German book on Minchiate was published in 1798 in Dresden; in 1830, there appeared an Italian version, which has remained unknown to the experts. In the Italian edition there are several strange terms applied to the game. Most of these were already present in the German edition, but the very fact that they have not been corrected when rendered into Italian can be indicative. In particular, we note the presence in the text of new Italian names that are definitely inappropriate, such as cartelli applied to the suit cards except for the King. The 1830 booklet deserves in any case a remarkable place in the meager literature specifically devoted to instructions for playing the noble game of Florentine Minchiate.




The book Regeln des Minchiatta-Spiels on the rules of minchiate - printed in Dresden in German in 1798 - has long been known and used by experts who usually consider it to be the clearest and most complete game regulation [note 1]. Several short descriptions of the game of minchiate and also handwritten Regeln, have been published, but there were only four printed editions dedicated exclusively to the game of minchiate, all anonymous. The first appeared in Rome in 1728 with a long title that began with Regole generali [General Rules] and had re-editions in Rome (1742 and 1773) and in Macerata (1746). The second was the Capitolo [Chapter] in verse, printed in Livorno in 1752. [note 2] The third, printed in Florence in 1781, again with a title that began with Regole generali, was followed again in Florence by re-editions of 1790, 1807, 1820, and 1852. The fourth and last is this Dresden edition of 1798, compiled, however, in German.

Due to its systematic nature and the extraordinarily useful presence of comments on entire hands, it must be recognized that the last of the four editions dedicated entirely to minchiate was also the most complete, so much so that it is even found at the basis of the recent presentation of the game by the Accademici de’ Germini [Academicians of the Germini]. [note 3]

Also in Dresden but in Italian, another edition, Regole delle Minchiatta, was published in 1830. The final examples are missing here, which represents a significant deficiency; however, everything else appears to have been translated entirely, as can now be easily verified thanks to the insertion of this edition online by the Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek in Weimar, where the only known copy is kept. [note 4]
__________________
1. https://www.tarock.info/Minchiatta.htm
2. F. Pratesi, The Playing-Card 47, No. 2 (2018) 103-113.
3. http://germini.altervista.org/
4. https://haab-digital.klassik-stiftung.d ... 8279489/2/

177
An initial first comment that can be made on this 1830 book is that barring errors, its existence has so far escaped all experts on the game. Other comments become necessary after an examination of the text and a comparison with the original German edition.

In the Italian text, we encounter unusual terms quite often, and the problem sometimes arises whether these are errors due to typographical composition - understandable by workers unfamiliar with the Italian language - or whether instead, the peculiarities of the text should be traced back to the author of the translation himself, perhaps due to the use of uncommon dialect forms.

An example that makes one think of the typographer is the wording Dell'Girare instead of the correct Del Girare. Several cases of this kind could be cited, but basically we can ignore all the examples of words mangled with the introduction of one or two letters different from the ordinary. However, there are technical terms that require some comment.

The first such term, Minchiatta, already existed in the German original and corresponds to the name of the game itself and the corresponding special cards. If it were a correct Italian term, it would sound better if used in the singular; instead, here it is used in the plural, exactly like "our" term of minchiate. Only in Dresden is Minchiatta written instead of minchiate.

Image

178
As occurs with Minchiatta, we find other terms in improper Italian, transferred unchanged from the German original to the Italian translation. If their presence in the German text could perhaps be explained by a German author's insufficient knowledge of a foreign language, whoever then translated everything into Italian should have made the necessary corrections.

In general, we note several references to internationally popular card games that could offer useful analogies to simplify explanations. Thus, to introduce the ascending or descending order of trick-taking power within the suits, it is added: “Just as in Ombre”; and to explain what the Versicole are, it is said that they are "like the honors in Whist, the Matadori in Ombre, and the Napolitane in Trisette." Alternated with the more common terms punti [points] and ponti [as a misspelling of the previous], the term points, used in the original German [with that spelling], is sometimes left. For individual tricks, the term bazze is regularly used, but levées is also found, as in the original German.

For the Matto [Fool], its alternative name of Squisse is added. The jack of coins is referred to as Fantina, but in minchiate also the jack of cups would typically be depicted as a maid. Also, the partner in the game is called a compagnone, a term left unchanged from the Compagnon of the original German, which could only denote dialectal use.

The term colori is used to indicate the four suits. There isn't much to comment on here because in fact the Italian terms used in this regard in the old (and new!) descriptions of card games are quite varied. As happens in other cases, the four suits are grouped two by two: cups and coins on one side, batons and swords on the other. Rather strangely, the attributes Rosse [Red] and Longhe [Long] are used respectively. Longhe for long doesn't cause problems, but it should be flanked by short or round, or similar, for the other pair. Instead, calling cups and coins Rosse would seem precisely due to their transformation into the corresponding "French" suits of hearts and diamonds, which could then be indicated as red, but in contrast with the other two suits, the black ones.

The Versicole are called that and not Verzicole, as is more commonly found in descriptions published in Italy. In fact, if we interpret that term as a derivation from "versicolore" or similar, with the meaning of combination of various suits, the reference would be to "diverso" and not to a non-nexistent "diverzo"; one would then have from Dresden, ultimately, an . . . Italian lesson.

Curiously, but not very, the term Tarocchi is used in an ambivalent way. On the one hand, that name applies (as documented in the most ancient texts) to the high cards of minchiate, those that would be added to an ordinary deck; on the other hand, it is used to indicate the entire "normal" tarocchi deck, as in the usage that has become common.


179
Perhaps the term that leaves the greatest doubts about the linguistic competence of the author or printer is impicciare, used together, predominantly, with impiccare. “Impiccare il re” [Hang the king] is the technical term in the game, introduced during the eighteenth century; if instead the term impicciare had been used in the sense of "to put the king in trouble, or in embarrassment," there would ultimately have been nothing too strange. However, “impicciare the kings” is read only in this description [of the rule], which derives from the technical term [impicieren, already present [mistakenly] in the German original, without understanding its meaning and origin.

A perhaps even more indicative case is found in the naming of the cards: the term Cartelli is used, very unusually, to indicate the cards without value, all those in the four suits with the exclusion of the kings. The corresponding term, the one most commonly read in Italian descriptions, is cartiglia, a noun which, however, has no other uses. In the German version, Cartillen was used, and cartelli evidently comes from there, but it would require an inexperienced translator. The suspicion is that here an incomprehensible Italian word has been replaced with one in common use, albeit with a different meaning.

In conclusion, in this Italian edition of 1830, we note several "strange" terms applied to the game of minchiate. Most of these were already present in the corresponding German edition of 1798, but the very fact that they are not corrected when switching to the Italian language may be relevant. In particular, we note the presence in the text of decidedly inappropriate Italian names like cartelli applied to the minor cards.

Overall, these are clues that could lead to a better understanding of the origin and use of both the German edition of 1798 and its Italian version published in 1830. For other editions on minchiate, similarly published anonymously, significant progress is being made today towards a convincing identification of the author. In the case in question here, the task of tracing the individual responsible for the compilation is practically impossible. However, from the linguistic peculiarities of the text, experts will be able to obtain some indications about the local environment.

The critical success that this edition receives today from experts at an international level should not lead us to imagine that the same was true originally. In particular, the examples that can be found today can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Regeln des Minchiatta-Spiels, 1798: Universitätsbibliothek, Erfurt; Landesbibliothek, Coburg; Det Kongelige Bibliotek, København; University Library, Cambridge. Regole delle Minchiatta, 1830: Herzogin Anna Amalia Bibliothek, Weimar.

The diffusion of this work certainly remained at a local level and very limited, so much so that the appearance of the Italian re-edition of 1830, now resurrected, is rather surprising, as it is not plausible that, despite the language, it had been printed for export to Italy.

Oct-Dec. 2018: The Capitolo delle Minchiate (Chapter on Minchiate)

This article and several others are out of place in this blog, due to my not noticing them on the site where Franco posts his articles, naibi.net - they are in the "articles first published in journals" section, at the top of the contents page, and I had been focusing on the "first published at naibi.net" section, at the bottom of the contents page. Well, better late than never.

 This one, the first article in a series of articles in The Playing-Card on 18th century books on the subject of the rules of minchiate, is a translation of "Il Capitolo delle Minchiate," on naibi.net at https://www.naibi.net/A/80-CARDS.pdf, originally in The Playing-Card 47, No. 2 (Oct.-Dec. 2018), pp. 103-113. The page numbers, which in this post are the numbers standing by themselves in the left margin, are those of the version on naibi.net, as opposed to those in the journal itself. Footnotes appear at the bottom of the corresponding page. Comments in brackets are mine, for clarification purposes, after consulting with Franco.

The link in Note 2 of this article no longer brings up anything relevant; it just shows something pertaining to a different organization. We would appreciate it if anyone could find the correct link.

The Capitolo delle Minchiate

Franco Pratesi

English Summary

The Capitolo delle Minchiate [Chapter of Minchiate] is an important poem on the Minchiate game, which also provides useful information on its rules. Four subsequent editions have been identified, all very rare: the Leghorn edition of 1752, an edition without date (now recognized as identical for the three copies preserved); and the two editions printed in Florence in 1777 and 1827. The game described is compatible with what we know both about the evolution of the rules, and on the atmosphere that surrounded it in the middle of the 18th century. The author was the Marquis Abbot Pio Enea degli Obizzi, from Ferrara; some information on his activity is reported. The “Lombard” town in which the text was written should thus be Ferrara, the same town in which we find the only copy of the Capitolo recorded in the OPAC catalog for all the Italian libraries.


Introduction


The complete text of the Capitolo under consideration can be read at the end of a preliminary version of this study [note 1] and on the IPCS web pages. [note 2] This investigation originated from a Domanda [Question], one of many published in Florence at the end of the nineteenth century in the Giornale di erudizione [Journal of Erudition]. At the time, and in the first decades of the following century, Florence played a notable role in the artistic and literary fields, remaining one of the main cultural centers at a national level; this also occurred in the publishing sector, with the publication of books and periodicals that became famous.

The Giornale di erudizione was published in Florence two or three times a month and was aimed at scholars and bibliophiles throughout the Kingdom of Italy. The Questions constituted a fundamental element of the Journal: a reader had encountered an insoluble problem in a bibliographic, literary, or scientific investigation and turned to the entire Italian cultural elite for assistance. The question was published with a title that clearly indicated its topic; as a rule, in subsequent issues of the magazine the relevant "answers" appeared from scholars capable of providing useful information. The Question of interest to us is the following.
_________________
1. http://trionfi.com/evx-minchiate-poem-17th-century
2. https://www.ipcs.org/misc/CapMin.pdf. TO BE FOUND.

2

Game of Minchiate. – Who is the author of a chapter relating to the game of minchiate that begins: "Since I learned the game of minchiate"; and how many editions were done? Could we then have information on other writings of a similar kind? A.L. [note 3]
As you can see, rather than one question, it is several connected questions: who was the author, how many editions were printed, what other similar writings are known. Unusually, this question went unanswered; no one from any city came forward to solve the case; evidently, it was a very difficult question, because among the readers there were experts in every sector, and of a high level. Let's try again now, after more than a century, taking advantage of the fact that bibliographic research has become much easier today.

The Capitolo

The text of the Capitolo is made up of a long poetic composition in rhyming tercets, and in the undated edition, which will be better described later, it is printed on twenty pages, numbered from 3 to 22. Each page contains six alternately rhyming tercets, except the first and last which have two fewer tercets; there are 349 hendecasyllables in total. The entire work describes the card game of Minchiate, the Florentine variant of the tarot that used the characteristic deck of 97 cards.

The beginning of the text is very clear and important: after the author learned to play minchiate, he no longer liked any of the games he played previously, and therefore he assiduously and constantly tried to make it appreciated also in his region, where the game was still not widespread: "And yet few people do it in Lombardy"; then under the name of Lombardy, one could understand all or almost all of northern Italy.

The Capitolo in question is aimed at people who do not yet know the elements of the game. The complexity of minchiate derives not only from the high number of cards, but even more from the scoring, which is based on the declaration of particular combinations of cards, or verzigole (counted both on the basis of the distribution of the cards at the beginning of the game, and by choosing them at the end from the cards won), and on the difference in score between the two opposing pairs at the end of the game. In short, the capture of some points derives directly from a lucky distribution of the cards, but to have a high score it is essential to play in the best way, to capture the valuable cards and count their combinations again at the end of the game.
_______________
3. Giornale di erudizione, Vol. I No. 9-10 (1888), 131.

3
It is known that the first compilations handed down on the rules of minchiate date back to the seventeenth century, with Malatesti's riddles [note 4], and above all with Paolo Minucci's notes to the Malmantile racquistato, [note 5] which describe the form of the game most used in Florence, the cradle of the game. It was an everyone-for-themselves game, so popular that in 1693 a ban was published prohibiting it in barber shops and public baths, but only after the evening bell ringing. [note 6] The Capitolo instead describes that game between two pairs, which in the eighteenth century also spread to other European countries, limited to the most prestigious courts, academies, and clubs.

The first impression is that the game rules set out in the Capitolo are not substantially different from what we know from the printed and manuscript treatises of the eighteenth century; starting from the precious manuscript of Regole [Rules] compiled by Niccolò Onesti in 1716, probably in Rome, found by Andrea Vitali and transcribed in full and extensively commented on by Girolamo Zorli. [note 7]

A comment on the game rules set out in the Capitolo could be that, as happens with many game regulations, there are some peculiarities here, too, that would require further agreements among the players to avoid arguments during the game. The first agreement, simple but indispensable, concerns the stakes; in fact, all the complex management of the score can ultimately be associated with small sums or entire estates, depending on what preliminary agreement establishes the correspondence between points and money.

However, upon first reading, the main experts on the game did not find any points of disagreement or notable originality in the Capitolo compared to the rules described in eighteenth-century sources. A peculiarity reported to me by Andrea Ricci is the following: "a custom that I cannot find described elsewhere, that is, the one that allows the card dealer to be able to give the cards under the cut directly to his partner, as long as they are less than nine.” [For the usual procedure of the “cut,” see any account of the rules of minchiate.] Nazario Renzoni has observed that in the Capitolo the distribution of the fola is substantially that present in the texts of the late eighteenth century [note 8] and could go back to the allusions to a "modern" custom already present in the Regole in the manuscript by Niccolò Onesti of
______________
4. La Sfinge enimmi del Sig. Antonio Malatesti. In questa nuova impressione aggiuntaci la terza parte con le Minchiate. Florence 1683.
5. Malmantile racquistato. Poema di Perlone Zipoli con le note di Puccio Lamoni. Florence 1688.
6. ASFI, Consulta poi Regia Consulta, prima serie, 30. Bando No. 49.
7. http://www.tretre.it/menu/accademia-del ... ti-e-saggi [now https://web.archive.org/web/20170213034 ... esti-1716/: Regole del nobile e dilettevole gioco delle Minchiate. For a summary in English, see A. Vitali at http://www.letarot.it/page.aspx?id=257&lng=ENG.]
8. Regole Generali del Nobilissimo Giuoco delle Minchiate, Rome 1773, and Regeln des Minchiatta-Spiels, Dresden 1798.


4
1716, mentioned above. Of originality [to this author], there can be noted only a few strategic observations during the game and reports to the companion, which the author himself indicates as devices he in fact used personally, not taken from any previous texts.

It is not easy to understand how widespread our Capitolo was. Judging by the copies preserved in public libraries, one would say that it remained completely unknown, or almost so; however, the type of publication must be considered, a small, thin booklet, which would easily have been lost; add to this the subject of the verses, which could not have been among the most appreciated by librarians, both public and private. The two Florentine editions, printed half a century apart, nevertheless demonstrate that the Capitolo had a certain success, at least in the homeland of minchiate.

Information about the author

In none of the known editions is the author's name printed. However, we read in various sources that the author was the Marquis degli Obizzi. The best-known writer of the family is the Paduan marquis Pio Enea degli Obizzi (1592-1674), who is usually referred to as Pio Enea II to distinguish him from his grandfather, who had built the prestigious family residence, the Castello of Catajo, a dozen kilometers south of Padua.

We must then exhume the "canonical" text in the copy preserved in Ferrara, cited among Ferrara writers, and ultimately look for an author who had that famous name, but without being either so well-known or so ancient. Decisive help comes to us from a group of manuscripts from the Obizzi family library, now preserved in Vienna in the Austrian National Library. The Obizzi family died out at the beginning of the nineteenth century and the properties came into the possession of the imperial Habsburg family. The Viennese documents were studied by Alfred Noe [note 9], who on that basis also provides us with an extensive genealogical tree of the family, limited to the male line, reproduced in Fig. 1.
____________
9. In: S. Loewe, A. Martino, A. Noe (eds.), Literatur ohne Grenzen, Frankfurt am M. 1993, pp. 282-310.


5 
ImageFigure 1. Obizzi family tree (from Alfred Noe).
In summary, our Marquis Abbot Pio Enea was the youngest son of Tommasso VII, in turn brother of Pio Enea III. Starting from uncle Pio Enea III, we go back from son to father up to Pio Enea I in the easiest way, with the same baptismal name transmitted from grandfather to grandson, interspersed with the name of Roberto, then upwards: Pio Enea III, Roberto V, Pio Enea II, Roberto IV and Pio Enea I. Naturally, other members of the family existed, previously, contemporaneously, and subsequently, until 1805. From other documents preserved in the Viennese collection, Alfred Noe deduces that our Pio Enea was born in 1719 and was consecrated a priest in 1753; in addition to the brothers indicated in the family tree, he had at least three sisters: Isabella, Caterina and Lucrezia.

Another piece of information is also of interest to us, again communicated by Alfred Noe. In one of the manuscripts of the group studied, Ser. N. 2106, a Memoir is inserted, in which the abbot Pio Enea, son of Tommaso, reported that in 1739 in Rome, in Santa Maria Aventina, he had found a tomb with the family's coat of arms. Furthermore, Mirna Bonazza, responsible for manuscripts and rare books at the Ariostea Municipal Library [note 10], has found in that library a letter sent by him, again from Rome, in 1742. [note 11] At this point, it becomes legitimate for us to imagine that this abbot had also discovered in Rome the game of minchiate, we know was then held in high esteem.

It is not easy to find precise information on this personage, but some mentions of his name can be identified with reference to the ducal court
____________
10. M. Bonazza, Email communication 07.23.18.
11. Ferrara, Ariostea Library, Cittadella Autographic Collection n. 2089. Lettera autografa di Pio Enea Obizzi. Rome, 23 June 1742, to the Marquis Giraldi Sacrati, Ferrara.

6
of Modena. The oldest of these notices sees him still as a boarder of the Collegio dei Nobili, engaged in three performances in the Teatro Ducale of Modena in 1737 to celebrate the birthday of Prince Rinaldo I. Of that event, there remains a booklet of about fifty pages printed in the same year as the performance [note 12]; here our personage appears as the last in a list of no less than 42 boarders of the College of Nobles who took part in the cantatas as dancers. In a similar event the following year we meet our Pio Enea again, but now he is actually one of the three authors of the recited text. The theatrical performances that were performed in Modena were studied by Alessandro Gandini, who compiled a three-volume Chronistoria [Chronological History] on them;[note 13] on p. 37 of the first volume, a play composed by three authors is cited that was performed in the Teatro Ducale di Piazza in 1738. [note 14]

We also have other kinds of information, which confirm not only the cultural level of this author, but also his commitment to the literary competition of the time. In 1746 we find our marquis abbot in his city, Ferrara. The testimony is not among the most direct: in a 48-page book printed in Padua in 1746 we find the text of an "academic speech Giovannandrea Barrotti recited in the Accademia del'Intrepidi of Ferrara on the evening of February 16th." The title is Of Alcina's blonde hair and black eyelashes. In the preface, Abbot Pio Enea degli Obizzi appears as editor of the publication. A copy of that academic speech is preserved in a collection of Barotti's letters in the Archiginnasio Library in Bologna (B200) and we find it indicated that that performance in the Accademia degli Intrepidi took place "under the Principality of the Marquis Pio Enea degli Obizzi." [note 15]

Evidently our author had been elected in those years to the top of the local academic consortium. In fact, Mirna Bonazza was recently able to find
_________________
12. Alessandro signor d’Albania, azione accademica da rappresentarsi nel Ducale Teatro Grande il felicissimo giorno natalizio del serenissimo signor principe di Modena, composta recitata e dedicata all’altezza serenissima di Rinaldo 1. Duca di Modena, Reggio, Mirandola ec. da’ signori Convittori del Collegio de’ Nobili. Bartolomeo Soliani, Modena 1737.
13. A. Gandini, Cronistoria dei teatri di Modena dal 1539 al 1871. Modena 1873.
14. Avvenimento al trono di Alessandro il Grande. Academic Action for Christmas Day HHS [His Highness Signore] Francesco III, Duke of Modena, composed by the Marquis Abbate Pio Enea degli Obizzi, Ferrarese, the aforementioned Count Magnani [from Modena] and Signore Paolino Ottolini, Lucchese patrician. [Azione Accademica pel giorno natalizio di S.A.S. Francesco III. Duca di Modena composta dal Marchese Abbate Pio Enea degli Obizzi Ferrarese, dal suddetto Conte Magnani {modenese} e dal signor Paolino Ottolini patrizio Lucchese.]
15. G. Mazzatinti, Inventario dei manoscritti. Vol. 69. Florence 1939, p. 10-11.

7
some confirmation in a manuscript with the list of the "princes" of the academy [note 16], where he is indicated as Pius Aeneas III, precisely for 1746, as shown in the reproduction of Fig. 2.
ImageFigure 2. Page from the Ristretto istorico [Historical Compendium].
(Ferrara, Biblioteca Comunale Ariostea, Coll. Antonelli 248, p. 28)

That Abbot Pio Enea was interested in Roman antiquities becomes even more plausible considering that a letter was sent to him with information on the first discoveries in the excavations of Herculaneum: there are conflicting opinions on the attribution of that letter to Papaudi, but if the sender is uncertain, the recipient is certain. [note 17] That letter was republished several times in various periodicals and collections of the time, so great was the interest in those antiquities that had come to light.
_______________________
16. Antonelli Collection 248, Ristretto istorico della fondazione e progresso dell’Accademia degl’Intrepidi di Ferrara, ed ordine cronologico dei principi d’Este dall’anno 1600 all’anno 1761.
17. Raccolta di opuscoli scientifici e filologici, 38. Venice 1748, pp. 349-354


8
Other traces of this author's cultural interests can be noted. Thus, in a long list of Associates, printed at the end of the famous Universal Dictionary, we find the name of the Marquis Abbot Pio Enea degli Obizzi, precisely for Ferrara.[note 18] Further traces could be indicated, particularly in the musical field, which would testify to the continuation of the personage's cultural interests; considering that our interest is limited to the game of minchiate, we can stop at the 1752 date of the Livorno edition and not ask ourselves whether what can be found for years approaching the end of the century still refers, as would seem probable, to the same author of the Capitolo or to another member of that noble family.

The various editions of the Capitolo


Very few copies of various editions of the Capitolo have been preserved, including some without dates, and the task of verifying whether the latter are the same or different is quite relevant.

1. Il giuoco delle minchiate. Capitolo. [The game of minchiate. Chapter.] Livorno, Gio. Paolo Fantechi, 1752. In 16°, 22 pp. This is indicated in No. 47 of Lensi's Bibliografia, which then comments: «Chapter in tercet rhyme by an unknown author, contains the rules of the game of minchiate, it begins: "Since I learned the game of minchiate." [note 19]

Unfortunately, Lensi does not write where he found an example of this work, nor even where he had obtained the printer and the date, which appear plausible considering the multifaceted activity of Giovanni Paolo Fantechi in Livorno; in those years, the printing house was indicated as Gio. Paolo Fantechi e Compagni, while a few years later it was indicated only by its name "in the name of Truth in Via Grande." Most of his editions were in the theatrical or religious field, but publications on various subjects also appeared.

It was possible to find an example of this dated edition in the Braidense National Library in Milan. The discovery occurred only thanks to the paper catalogs, because the copy does not yet appear in the digital ones. The title page is reproduced in Fig. 3.
__________________
18. E. Chambers, Dizionario universale delle arti e delle scienze. [Vol.] VIII. Venice 1748
19. A. Lensi, Bibliografia italiana dei giuochi di carte. Florence 1892.


9

 Image  Figure 3 – Title page of the Livorno edition. (Milan, Biblioteca Nazionale Braidense, 3.3.C.25.5)


2A) Il gioco delle minchiate capitolo. [The game of minchiate chapter.] 22 p.; in 12°.

A copy of this edition is preserved in Oxford in the Bodleian Libraries, with signature 013983413 Association copies – Jessel. In the Bodleian catalog the typographical data "Livorno, Gio. Paolo Fantechi, 1752" is indicated in brackets, as if it was actually absent in the work and only taken from some other source. Thanks to the courtesy of the Oxford librarians (and in particular Francesca Galligan), it was possible to obtain more precise information. The book arrived in the Bodleian with the gift of the rich Jessel collection. Frederick Henry Jessel (1859–1934) was an expert collector who compiled a famous bibliography on playing cards in 1905; probably in his hand is the annotation that this book was printed in Livorno in 1752. Another annotation cites Lensi's bibliography, which is plausibly at the origin of what is indicated in the catalog. There are no other possible supporting sources. This book was already cited by Michael Dummett [note 20], who, unusually, seems to have used this text available in "his" Bodleian Library solely for a comment on the Genoese variant of ganellini, citing the term Ganellino attributed here to number One of the tarocchi. In reality, however, this edition, indicated [also by him] as printed in Livorno in 1752, appears actually
______________
20. M. Dummett, The Game of Tarot, London 1980, p. 339.


10
to have been published without editorial notes. Let's look at other editions, which were similarly published without date and place of printing.


2B) Il gioco delle minchiate capitolo. [The game of minchiate chapter.] 22 p.; in 12°.

Present in the Ariostea Municipal Library of Ferrara with signature A 12. This edition is the only one to appear in the SBN OPAC catalog, updated for all Italian libraries. Even if we search for specimens in the online catalog of the main European libraries we find (as of mid-2018) only this specimen. [note 21] In this copy, there is a handwritten note "From Canon Pio Enea degli Obizzi." In the bibliographical indications of the catalog of the Ariostea Municipal Library, again accompanying the Ferrara specimen, a quotation from a manuscript work preserved in that library is reported: “The author Pio Enea degli Obizzi is taken from G. Antonelli, Indicem operum ferrariensium scriptorum, 1834.”

2C) Another copy without typographical notes, to be checked if different, is preserved in the Humanistic Library of the University of Florence with signature: Misc.A.300.1. Like the Ambrosiana edition, this example also does not appear in the SBN OPAC catalog, as it has not yet been included in the electronic cataloging. A membership stamp indicates the Royal Institute of Florence and dates back to the end of the 19th century or the beginning of the 20th century. From the inventory of the time it seems that it belonged to a group of books donated by the University's botanical Cabinet, where it would have arrived as an inheritance from a donor whose name has not been preserved. Written in pencil on the last page we read: -.3.6. This is probably the price of the booklet in the traditional L.s.d system, i.e., three and a half soldi; perhaps useful information, but insufficient for a certain dating.

Thanks to the checks carried out on the copies, it was ascertained that this edition is identical to the one preserved in Ferrara. The question was whether these two editions without typographical data could be the same as the edition preserved in Oxford, and the comparison confirmed that in fact in the three cases it is the same print. It seems unlikely that this edition was printed before the Livorno one; in fact, the hypothesis that it was instead an illegal copy, printed using that as a source, is more convincing. Two other editions, dated and different from this one, were published in Florence at a later time.
_______________
21. http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/tel4/ ... iate%29%29

11
3) Delle regole delle minchiate capitolo in terza rima: publicato per uso de’ dilettanti di detto gioco. [Of the rules of minchiate chapter in tercet rhyme: published for the use of enthusiasts of said game.] In Giuseppe Allegrini's printing house, Florence 1777. 20 pages.

With a bibliographic search on the Internet, only one example can be found, present abroad in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, with signature: IC7.Al525.777d. In particular, the librarian responsible, James Capobianco, confirmed that this book was donated to the library in November 1927 by the children of Charles Eliot Norton (1827-1908). Another copy (if not found to be precisely that same example) was present in the mid-nineteenth century in the library of the Marquis Costabili of Ferrara; in the relevant catalog, compiled on the occasion of the sale, it appears at No. 3494, with the attribution to Pio Enea degli Obizzi [note 22] printed next to the title.

That this attribution also appears in this document is not surprising, given the information that comes from other sources, but in this case the publisher inserts a preliminary comment on the matter that is of interest. This Notice does not indicate anything more about the author of the Capitolo: “whom I believe Lombard, is not known to me” [che credo Lombardo, non mi è noto]; but it offers us confirmation of the atmosphere that surrounded the game of minchiate, intelligent entertainment in the conversation rooms.
Printer's Notice (From the 1777 edition)
Among the games that have been invented since they began three centuries ago [in reality there would have been four. FP] to play with cards, there is perhaps none more industrious, that is, one that gives scope to the art and subtlety of the player, than that of Minchiate, also called Tarocchi and Germini by the good writers of our Italian language. For this reason, it has been observed that the wittiest people from beyond the Alps, when they cross the Alps to stay for some time in Italy, demonstrate a great genius for learning it, and some of them even engage in it to the point of contending with the most experienced and expert. I am reminded of a person of great birth, having to settle in these districts for reasons of ministry, who found so much pleasure in having learned it, that he even went so far as to say that he found it the only remedy for passing the winter vigils without tedium. Time advances even for the most burdened by occupation and study; nor can one always sustain company for many hours with only dialog and the daily newspaper. What more innocent entertainment than testing one's industry and fortune with Minchiate in hand among four friends? This is why I was led to publish these verses, which contain all the rules and almost all the subtleties of such a noble and entertaining game. The Author of this Chapter, whom I believe Lombard, is not known to me; but I know very well that even without this information, anyone will admire the ease and
_________________
22. Catalogue de la première partie de la bibliothèque de M. le Marquis Costabili de Ferrare. Bologna 1858.


12
accuracy of the Poet Legislator, and this composition can be regarded as the Code of Minchiate.
4) Capitolo relativo al giuoco delle minchiate. [Chapter relating to the game of minchiate.] Florence, in the Grand Ducal Printing House, 1827. 22 p. 18cm.

This edition is also present in the aforementioned Alfredo Lensi Bibliografia. It is listed as no. 23, with data: in -8, pp. 22, and the comment that refers to the other: “For the description of this pamphlet see the 1752 edition at n. 47.” An example is present in the Vatican Apostolic Library, with signature Stamp Ferr.V.7286 (int.15). Of this edition it is possible to point out a copy recently put up for sale by an antiquarian bookshop in Padua [note 23]; in the catalog description we read: “First edition. (. . .) No clear examples registered in ICCU. Lensi n. 23.”

It is surprising that no copy of these two Florentine editions can be found in Tuscan public libraries.

Conclusion

The Question about the game of minchiate, published in 1888 in a journal for bibliophiles and left unanswered at the time, has found an answer, accompanied by further information on the subject. In particular, a compilation of the text towards the middle of the seventeenth century, considered possible in an initial phase of this study, is not at all plausible. The date of composition of the Capitolo is close to that of the first printing known to us, Livorno 1752; we are in the middle of the eighteenth century, when the type of game described is better in conformity with what we know in general both about the evolution of the game’s rules and the atmosphere that surrounded it.

The author was Marquis Abbot Pio Enea degli Obizzi, from Ferrara, about whose activity some information has been provided here; the "Lombard" city in which the text was written is therefore Ferrara, the same city in which the only copy of the Capitolo registered in the OPAC for all Italian libraries is still found. The various editions identified are reduced to four, all very rare: the Livorno edition of 1752, an undated edition (now recognized as identical for the three copies found); and the two editions printed in Florence half a century apart, in 1777 and 1827.
_______________
23. Edizioni Pregiate. Libri Stampe e Disegni dal XVI al XX Secolo. Bado and Mart, Padua, circa 2009. (Reported by Sergio A. Bonanni.)

June 10, 2024: 1712 - The games of Lorenzo Stecchi

This is the third of three notes on books of magic tricks, "1712 - I giochi di Lorenzo Stecchi," posted June 10, 2024, at https://www.naibi.net/A/STECCHI.pdf. (The other two are posted immediately before this one.) Notes in brackets are mine in consultation with Franco, and the page numbers are those of Franco's online Italian pdf.


1712 - The games of Lorenzo Stecchi

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction


I present here the third of the three manuscript books that I recently found in the Central National Library of Florence; like the second, this third book is preserved in the Targioni Tozzetti collection, which "preserves the manuscripts and papers resulting from the scientific activity of Giovanni (1712-1783), Ottaviano (1755-1826), and Antonio Targioni Tozzetti (1785-1856), as well as some important codices by Pier Antonio Micheli (1679-1737).”

The three manuscripts can all be found in the library inventories by searching for "giochi di carte" [games of cards], but in these cases, we are not talking about traditional card games, as minchiate typically is in Tuscany, but about magic tricks. Some general considerations in this regard are present in the studies relating to the first two books and I refer anyone who is interested to those. [note 1]

2. Lorenzo Stecchi's book. [note 2]

Unusually, for this 107-page book we have the author, Lorenzo Stecchi, and also the date, 1712. This is information that we find directly on the title page of the book where we read the following. “1712 Rules for learning to play all sorts of games of sleight of hand, Bussolotti, ribbons, and cards no longer seen, written by me Lorenzo Stecchi and tested, one by one.” Almost verbatim the same information is found in the Vannucci Inventory of the BNCF. [note 3] 

BCNF Targioni Tozzetti, 120. Cover and title page (Reproduction prohibited)

_______________
1. https://www.naibi.net/A/MAGIA.pdf; https://www.naibi.net/A/TARGIONI.pdf
2. BNCF, Targioni Tozzetti, 120. [Regole per imparare a fare tutte le sorte di Giuochi di destrezza di mano, Bussolotti, di nastri, e di carte non piu visti, scritti da me Lorenzo Stecchi et esperimentati, ad uno ad uno.]
3. https://archive.org/details/sala.-mss.c ... 7/mode/2up


Page 2
If we look for information on Lorenzo Stecchi, we encounter a professor from the University of Pisa with science studies, or natural philosophy, and in particular his book on meteors. [note 4] However, nothing confirms that it is the same person, also because, in reality, the teacher is indicated as Giovanni Lorenzo. The handwriting also leaves some doubts in this regard, because on the one hand, the handwriting appears more professional than usual, but on the other hand, rather incorrect forms are frequently noted. The comparison of this text with that of an autograph letter by Professor Giovanni Lorenzo Stecchi, preserved in the Riccardiana Library [note 5] was decisive: the calligraphies are decidedly different, and therefore the hypothesis of attributing the book in question to the Pisan professor also falls short.

In this book, the games that use playing cards are not found at the beginning but are grouped together in a second part, as listed below. The games are not numbered; the initial numbers are those of the corresponding pages. The overall number of these games is significantly lower than that encountered in the two books described previously.
56 Making a card be taken and divining what card it is by smell alone and without seeing it
59 Having a card removed and then making two piles of the rest of the cards and leaving the room, divining which pile the card was placed on, and also having the person who removed the card cover it with the back of his hand, and showing him another card from the other pile and placing it in the palm of his hand, making it so that the card he removed comes to the palm of his hand and that which is on the palm goes under the back of his hand where the one he had previously taken out was before.
64 Having someone think of a card from the deck, and after having made it be thought of, without his telling anyone, divining what card was thought of, making three piles of them.
66 Having five cards be drawn, so that all five are the same as the one that he will draw last.
71 Having a card taken out, and then mixing it with the others, and then throwing the deck of cards in the air, making it that the card taken out remains attached to the ceiling or a window shutter.
73 Having a card taken out and then making it go into a girl's shoe or someplace else.
76 Throwing a pack of cards onto the fire, and after they are burnt, making them come back down from the chimney, naming them card by card.
78 Making the Ace of Clubs disappear, and making it become the Ace of Hearts, or making the Jack of Spades disappear and making it become the Jack of Diamonds, or something else.
80 Taking five cards from a deck and showing them to everyone, and then making them all blank, being first colored like the others.
85 Having a card be taken out, and then having it returned and mixed with the others, making said card walk over the table.
89 Blindfolding your eyes with a cloth, and then taking a deck of cards, and divining which is a court card and which is not a court card.
90 Taking a minchiate deck and making a bird come out of it, or indeed other gallantries.
102 Having a person make three piles of a deck of cards, in the form you will see below, and then, taking the rest of the cards, knowing how many points are under those piles.
3. Examples
64 Having someone think of a card from the deck, and after having made it be thought of, without his telling anyone, divining what card was thought of, making three piles of them.
Rule
To play said game, take twenty-one cards of which the person is made to think of one, and after having thought of it, make three stacks in this way, as you see,

1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
____________
4. Delle meteore libri tre poema filosofico di Gio. Lorenzo Stecchi lettore di filosofia nell'Universita di Pisa. Florence 1726.
5. MS Ricc. 3452/6 c. 275.


Page 3
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
19 20 21

but one above the other, that is, the four above the one, the 5 above the 2, the 6 above the three, the seven above the four, the eight above the five, the nine above the six, and so on, that in essence there are only three piles as you can see; and then tell him that he should look at which pile the one he thought of is in, and saying so, put that pile where the card thought of is in the middle of the other two piles and start again from the beginning, and count again, as above i.e. 1, 2, 3, etc. and ask again which pile the card thought of is in, and place that pile where it is in the middle of the other two, and again count 1, 2, 3, as before and be told again which pile the card thought of is in, and similarly putting in the middle, and then counting, that card that will come at No. 11; that is that card which was thought of; that is how the game is done.
 

BNCF, Targioni Tozzetti, 120, p. 65 (Reproduction prohibited)

Page 4 

BNCF, Targioni Tozzetti, 120, p. 80 (Reproduction prohibited)
73 Having a card taken out and then making it go into a Girl's shoe or someplace else.
Rule
To play this game you must have two similar cards in the deck, that is, two 5s of hearts, or whatever you want, and one of these you must give to some Woman of your correspondents and friends, so that in some way, and under some pretext, she must put it in a shoe of one of those girls who are to be at that evening party, and after having put she must tell you, and then you propose the game, and take the cards and put the similar card underneath, which you then have to put in the middle, slanting as usual, and having that double card taken out, and then having it given to you, and putting it in the deck, talking about some nonsense while you are shuffling, pretending that you have forgotten which card he has drawn, and you look carefully in the deck two or three times and say that you can't find it there, and you don't remember what card it is, and so begging the one who drew it to say what card he drew, and hearing it, pretending to search again in the deck but not finding it, and telling the audience that the card isn’t there, and therefore they have to order where they want the card to be found.
Page 5
Then another of your correspondents will say to you to make it go in the right shoe of that girl, or wherever it was put, and then you have to make a few faces, saying that it is too difficult, but your correspondent making sure to say that he wants it there, then commanding Berlicche [note 6] that the card go into that Shoe, and inspection made and said card found, it will turn out to be a very wonderful and beautiful game.

89 Blindfolding your eyes with a cloth, and then taking a deck of cards and guessing which is a Court card and which is not a Court card
Rule
To play this game you must have a Companion, [note 7] who must be instructed in this way. Firstly, when you have proposed the game and have blindfolded your eyes, he must stand in front of you, and when you have the cards in your hands, you must hold them facing the people, and the Companion, seeing a court card, must step on your feet, and you, feeling your toes stepped on, must say this: it is a court card; and then saying this is not a court card, until you feel your Feet being stepped on again, and continue doing so until you have the cards in your hand, which will make a very beautiful game.

90 Taking a pack of minchiate and making a little bird come out of it, or other Gallantry.
Rule
To play this game, you must have two decks of similar minchiates, one natural, and the other in this way, first you have to take sixty of said cards and cut them in the middle, that is, only that little bit remains from the sides, as seen below, and when you have cut the aforementioned cards into that shape you must form them, like a small box, gluing them one on top of the other in this manner, then placing the other cards underneath it will look like a natural deck of cards, [note 8] and If you want to play the game, in said little box you must place a little bird, or instead lemons, confetti, or whatever you want without anyone seeing, then taking said cards in your hand, begin to shuffle those loose cards that are below and say it would be a nice game, if from this deck of Cards I were to bring out a Goose, a Peacock, a Capon, [note 9] a Thrush, or whatever Your Lordships want, and then one of your Correspondents, Knowing the Thing that is in the Cards must say, I would like you to bring out such and such a thing, and you then start shuffling and quickly saying Berlicche Berlocche [note 10] - let's say there is a Calderugio [note 11] inside - I command you, Lord [Lady?] Cards, to send out a Calderugio, and having someone parare [stretch out?] his/her hands, opening [you open] the box, namely by removing the card that holds it closed, so that the Calderugio will come out, and you immediately remove the Cards and place them in your box, but your Confederate must ask to see the cards a little, and you then take the other natural deck of Cards and show them to everyone, the game will be more wonderful and beautiful.
________________
6. Devil's name, used in jest.
7. In the first of the three manuscripts examined, this game is played with a prepared deck and without a partner.
8. In fact, 37 free cards remain, one above and the others below the box (made up of 60) so that they can be shuffled and cut at will.
9. It's easy to play the boaster, having the “correspondent” ready to avoid insoluble problems.
10. Common magic spell to impress the audience.
11. Disused term for goldfinch.

Page 6 

BNCF, Targioni Tozzetti, 120, p. 91 (Reproduction prohibited)